ACOG: ObGyns Issue Less Restrictive VBAC Guidelines (xp)
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: ACOG: ObGyns Issue Less Restrictive VBAC Guidelines (xp)

  1. #1
    Mega Poster krazykat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    TN/KY Line
    Posts
    4,582

    Default ACOG: ObGyns Issue Less Restrictive VBAC Guidelines (xp)

    To include twins and 2 previous c-sections!! Woooohooooo!!! Check this out!

    http://www.acog.org/from_home/public...07-21-10-1.cfm
    Ariel & John: Military Family since May 17, 2006

    Sylvia: 12/18/08, Justus: 9/17/10, Bunni: 5/11/12, Surprise Baby: Guess Date 11/5/13



  2. #2
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    5,217

    Default

    good to see! maybe this is a positive step
    Me 33
    DH 32
    Angel babies 9/06 & 3/07
    DS born June 11, 2008
    DD born February 11, 2011
    Miss Blue Eyes

  3. #3
    Posting Addict MrsMangoBabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Oklahoma City
    Posts
    5,399

    Default

    it looks like they are clarifying their position on the "immediately available" surgical back up, too:

    Women and their physicians may still make a plan for a TOLAC in situations where there may not be "immediately available" staff to handle emergencies, but it requires a thorough discussion of the local health care system, the available resources, and the potential for incremental risk. "It is absolutely critical that a woman and her physician discuss VBAC early in the prenatal care period so that logistical plans can be made well in advance," said Dr. Grobman. And those hospitals that lack "immediately available" staff should develop a clear process for gathering them quickly and all hospitals should have a plan in place for managing emergency uterine ruptures, however rarely they may occur, Dr. Grobman added.

    The College says that restrictive VBAC policies should not be used to force women to undergo a repeat cesarean delivery against their will if, for example, a woman in labor presents for care and declines a repeat cesarean delivery at a center that does not support TOLAC. On the other hand, if, during prenatal care, a physician is uncomfortable with a patient's desire to undergo VBAC, it is appropriate to refer her to another physician or center.
    That may be the best we get.

    I think that a lot of women who chose RCS over VBAC do so because the "information" they're given overstates the risks of VBAC and downplays the c/s risks. I also am not a fan of the phrase "trial of labor," but I agree this press release definitely reflects a step in the right direction.

    Thank you, NIH VBAC conference!
    -Brittany
    Doula, Childbirth Educator, and Mom to three adorable troublemakers
    Two time joyful Hypnobabies natural birthing mom
    My blog: Birth Unplugged

  4. #4
    Posting Addict momW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Smalltown, Illinois
    Posts
    8,403

    Default

    Ariel, I can't tell you how excited I was to see this release today!!!! I know what I'm doing is right and safe, but now that ACOG finally admits that it's safe maybe people won't tell me how wreckless and selfish I'm being by doing a VBA2C!!!!!

    I'm thinking really seriously about printing this and mailing it to the dr I had at 1st with DS that told me a VBAC was not safe at all!!!

    I just hope this gets through eventually to the OB's!!!!

  5. #5
    Mega Poster krazykat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    TN/KY Line
    Posts
    4,582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by momW View Post
    Ariel, I can't tell you how excited I was to see this release today!!!! I know what I'm doing is right and safe, but now that ACOG finally admits that it's safe maybe people won't tell me how wreckless and selfish I'm being by doing a VBA2C!!!!!

    I'm thinking really seriously about printing this and mailing it to the dr I had at 1st with DS that told me a VBAC was not safe at all!!!

    I just hope this gets through eventually to the OB's!!!!
    You go girl!! Print and mail!! I have been known to do that myself lol!

    And Brittany, I agree... I was so happy to see that it plainly says in there that a woman should not be restricted due to hospital policy if she refuses a repeat c/s. Like I said on the Sept 2010 board, the whole uterine rupture thing frustrates me to no end b/c UR is a risk whether you are a FTM or have had a c/s, so if they are going to make such strict requirements, then all hospitals need to have the resources to deal with emergency situations like that. UR and accessibility to immediate surgery has been the primary basis for the vbac bans... hopefully b/c of this they don't have anything to stand on anymore. I can't wait to see if this makes a difference!!! Fingers crossed!!
    Ariel & John: Military Family since May 17, 2006

    Sylvia: 12/18/08, Justus: 9/17/10, Bunni: 5/11/12, Surprise Baby: Guess Date 11/5/13



  6. #6
    Posting Addict Spacers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    My avatar is the tai chi -- a symbol of the eternal cycle of life
    Posts
    16,397

    Default

    I never understood the "immediately available" thing myself. If a surgeon & anesthesiologist aren't available enough for a VBAC, then why in the world is that hospital letting anyone give birth there?

    And for the revised guidelines!!!
    David Letterman is retiring. Such great memories of watching him over the past thirty-two years!

  7. #7
    Posting Addict jolly11sd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    California
    Posts
    8,581

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spacers View Post
    I never understood the "immediately available" thing myself. If a surgeon & anesthesiologist aren't available enough for a VBAC, then why in the world is that hospital letting anyone give birth there?
    My thoughts exactly!
    ~Joy~ DS1-8/5/05, DS2-10/18/10 (VBAC#1), DS3- 4/11/12 (VBAC#2!)


  8. #8
    Posting Addict cmljll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    South Louisiana
    Posts
    6,501

    Default

    I was so thrilled to see that article this morning! If I ever have another baby I'm planning a VBA2C so this was really welcome news!
    Connie
    Wife to Jesse (October '96)
    Mommy to Ethan (July '07) & Gabriel (December '09)

    Follow my journey to a healthier me! http://cmlhealth.blogspot.com/

    Parenting blog http://christian-ap-momma.blogspot.com/



  9. #9
    Super Poster DJMandyB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    687

    Default

    Great news! If I were going for a VBAC I would be bringing a stack of copies of that with me just in case.
    Mandy 29, DH Carl 31
    Married 6/5/04

    AlternaTickers - Cool, free Web tickers

  10. #10
    Mega Poster Mom2ThreeKiddos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    4,785

    Default

    We got the notification the other day through ICAN. I think this is a good first step. I just hope that some actual policy change starts to happen with it.
    Christy birth doula, Hypnobabies instructor, small business owner & most importantly MOMMY.

    http://nurturedbabyboutique.com



+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
v -->

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Terms & Conditions