GD Question
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: GD Question

  1. #1
    Posting Addict tink9702's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    5,621

    Default GD Question

    Hi All,

    Haven't posted much lately here, but have been lurking!

    Anyway - the subject of Gestational Diabetes came up and I'm wondering if anyone has declined the testing, reasons, research behind doing so etc. Also wondering if the awful drink test is the only way you might be able to detect GD unless you were having unusual fatigue or more of the obvious symptoms of GD.
    ~~Mel

    Ethan - June 21, 2009
    Olivia - December 5, 2010
    5w3d - October/November 2012

    My Ovulation Chart

  2. #2
    Prolific Poster ftmom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,378

    Default

    My sister declined it, because she has had 3 before with no problems and is in really good shape, so no more risk factors than last time. However, due to the fact that I have had it 3 times, our cousin has had it 3 times and our Dad and his brother are both pre-diabetic, I would not have made the same choice as her But if diabetes didnt run in our family, and I was in her place, I might have declined it too.

    Other ways you can tell you have it, is just to check your blood if you have access to a tester. You can easily find 'norms' for numbers on the internet, so you just eat a very sugary, or high carb, meal and then test your own blood an hour later. If you have no problems then your numbers should be down into the normal range by then. With my second I never had to have the test, I just started checking my own blood and saw my numbers where climbing. In fact, the diabetes education lady at the hospital told us that this is a more accurate read than the test, and that I should do this 6 months after baby is born to make sure everything has gone back to normal, as opposed to taking another test at that time.

    I have also read studies where they have given women gummy bears instead of that orange drink, and it is supposed to give a more accurate response, but I dont know if anywhere actually does it that way IRL.

    Hope that helps
    Kyla
    Mom to Arianna (5), Conner (3) and Trent (my baby)

  3. #3
    Posting Addict Marite13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Southeast Asia
    Posts
    7,537

    Default

    Audra, has good links and info on this. Hopefully she'll come post.

    I declined it this time, but my HB midwife was never worried about it at all.

    My SIL had a HB in Colorado, and her MW gave her a tester to take home for a couple days, taught her how to use it, etc... and so she essentially tested herself to make sure she was good.
    Mara & Joel, 2009




  4. #4
    Community Host kridda_88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    in a house full of boys
    Posts
    4,163

    Default

    I declined mine as well. I have had 2 pregnancies with out it, I am smaller, and no family history. My midwife gave me the option of just testing my sugar levels for 3 days just like a diabetic would. That is a lot more accurate then taking the drink because with the drink you sugar shock your body and the stupid thing can actually end up causing the diabetes.
    K&S-8/18/07
    DS1-7/18/08, DS2-2/23/10, DS3 1/18/12


  5. #5
    Posting Addict Spacers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    My avatar is the tai chi -- a symbol of the eternal cycle of life
    Posts
    16,486

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kridda_88 View Post
    That is a lot more accurate then taking the drink because with the drink you sugar shock your body and the stupid thing can actually end up causing the diabetes.
    I'm going to respectfully disagree with both of these statements. GD isn't a problem with one's blood sugar levels themselves, as regular diabetes is; it is the body's reaction to excess sugar, which mimics what happens in later pregnancy when the increased blood flow puts additional strain on the body's metabolism. That's precisely why the glucose challenge is the best test for it -- you need the sugar shock to see if your body produces the correct response or not. And there is absolutely no way this test can cause GD, no way, no how, that's simply not how the human body works. I'd be interested to see what kind of source you might be able to cite for this.

    I did take the glucose challenge test both times, and I took it twice during my pregnancy with Tiven, because I'm prone to hypoglycemia (low blood sugar which is not caused by treatment of Type 1 diabetes) which indicates that my body may have trouble regulating its production of insulin. It was important to make sure that my body was producing the proper insulin response to a sugar shock, not too little (which would be a diagnosis of GD) but also not too much as might be the case for me personally. I've also taken it a couple of times when not pregnant.

    There are other flavors of the drink available; I liked the cola flavor because it seemed a bit more carbonated than the orange and I never tried the lime but I've heard it's just like drinking straight margarita mix. My midwife does the glucose challenge with Brach's jelly beans during a routine prenatal; you eat a certain number of them and then she checks your blood sugar after an hour. Labs like the drink because they know that it's 50 grams of glucose in a form that can be consumed within five minutes, but I know moms who have taken jelly beans (in the package so the lab can document the amount of glucose) to the lab.
    David Letterman is retiring. Such great memories of watching him over the past thirty-two years!

  6. #6
    Posting Addict cactuswren's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    8,144

    Default

    Honestly my only real problem with it was that the drink was packed with a bunch of extra garbage like Red #40...I get the point of the test, and controlling the glucose for accurate results, but I would really like the option to not drink a bunch of additives and chemicals I'd never normally touch, much less while pregnant, in the name of health! I find that really irritating.

    My only options were orange and red, and seeing as I loathe orange flavor, I took red flavor. It was predictably ridiculously sweet but drinkable.
    -Leigh-
    DD Adair Lucille 7/6/10
    DD Faye Louise 10/19/13

    Lilypie First Birthday tickers

  7. #7
    Posting Addict tink9702's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    5,621

    Default

    Thanks Stacy - that makes a lot more sense on why they do the test that way, it's just easier and more standard. It also makes sense with what you are saying that you are supposed to shock your system.

    I think my issue with it is actually how it just is so sicky sweet. My MW practice has the lime flavor (which is clear so no dyes I don't think) but it's just gross! It doesn't help that since I'm overweight I am asked to do the testing twice each pregnancy. *sigh* more reason to stick to my diet I guess!
    ~~Mel

    Ethan - June 21, 2009
    Olivia - December 5, 2010
    5w3d - October/November 2012

    My Ovulation Chart

  8. #8
    Posting Addict boilermaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Rocky Mtns.
    Posts
    19,380

    Default

    I've declined the test with my last three pregnancies. For many reasons-- the biggest is that the test isn't very accurate. You can't reproduce the same results multiple times on the same woman. It is somewhat arbitrary. Second, screening for GD has not improved outcomes. So the evidence to continue routine screening for GD is pretty scarce IMO-- but it IS standard practice.

    Mostly, I think all women should be following essentially a GD diet when pregnant anyways (and probably when not pregnant.) We should all be counseled on exercising though out pregnancy and on eating protein and complex carbs and good fruits and veggies. Instead, I feel like OB's never mention the nutrition part to women who "pass" the GD test, when it is really really relevant to EVERY pregnant mom and EVERY baby.

    I opt to screen my urine, and to finger pokes throughout my pregnancy. I get that sugar levels can affect the health of a fetus and newborn-- but I just don't think that the GD test is the "answer".

    Ina May has some great articles on the GD test and goes into depth about in the Thinking Woman's Guide. Good reading IMO, even if you opt to take the GD test.
    Audra
    DH Trey
    DD 8.03, DD 6.05, DS 3.07, DD 5.09, and DS arrived 6.17.12
    www.mamaginger.com

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
v -->

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Terms & Conditions