Labor poll-moms of more than 2
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Labor poll-moms of more than 2

  1. #1
    Prolific Poster emansmom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Michigan, Go Spartans!!
    Posts
    1,975

    Default Labor poll-moms of more than 2

    Ok so I was just wondering for moms of more than 2 how your 3rd and subsequent labors went? My midwives say that 2nd labors tend to be the most efficient (obviously not always the case!!) and then every labor after that is a wild card and may be super long, super short or anywhere in between. I am not preggo with 3 yet but just want to be prepared for when I am

    So my first labor was 14 hrs and my second was 5 with only 2.5 of that being active labor. I really liked the 5 hr and I would be kind of scared for it to be faster than that!
    ~Marcia~
    DH Garrett,
    DS Ethan 1/29/08,
    DD Lola 2/2/10
    DS2 Weston 2/18/12

  2. #2
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    14,461

    Default

    My 2nd was 12 hours (8'4) my 3rd 48 (9.2). Fun times
    Last edited by Potter75; 09-25-2010 at 06:20 PM.

  3. #3
    Emilys3Guppies
    Guest

    Default

    1. 17 hours
    2. 2.5 hours
    3. 6 hours
    4. less than 2 hours

  4. #4
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    9,859

    Default

    1. 4 hrs (from water break, first ctx) - 6 pd 5 oz baby
    2. 3 hrs 45 min (from first ctx, no SROM that time) - 9 pd baby

    So second was only slightly shorter, but got out more than two pds of baby faster, so much more efficient.

  5. #5
    Emilys3Guppies
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Khaki View Post
    1. 4 hrs (from water break, first ctx) - 6 pd 5 oz baby
    2. 3 hrs 45 min (from first ctx, no SROM that time) - 9 pd baby

    So second was only slightly shorter, but got out more than two pds of baby faster, so much more efficient.
    Was he in a better position inutero, Karly? My babies labours have all been as fast as their position. My longest was posterior, my two really short labours were LOA babies and my 6 hour labour started ROA. My midwife and I both agree, anecdotally, that position makes a big difference to length of labour.

  6. #6
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    14,461

    Default

    My baby was LOA in the days before labor (my 3rd baby) but that and my first labor started with SROM. BOTH times it dropped baby into my pelvis in an ascylintic (sp?) position which ultimately led to them not coming out and agonizingly slow dilation/cervical lip/swelling due to them being so malpositioned/crooked in there. I officially hate and resent SROM My quick labor (well, quick for me) started without SROM.

  7. #7
    Emilys3Guppies
    Guest

    Default

    I hate SROM too, Melis. My 3rd had SROM 12 hours before labour kicked in...and while it wasn't near the experience you had recently, it did mean I was doing squats on the stairs at 8cm to get his chin to flex. Uggg.

  8. #8
    Posting Addict SaucyVidel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    11,284

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Potter75 View Post
    My baby was LOA in the days before labor (my 3rd baby) but that and my first labor started with SROM. BOTH times it dropped baby into my pelvis in an ascylintic (sp?) position which ultimately led to them not coming out and agonizingly slow dilation/cervical lip/swelling due to them being so malpositioned/crooked in there. I officially hate and resent SROM My quick labor (well, quick for me) started without SROM.
    Word. Those asynclitic babies are killer. Callie was asynclitic and ended with the epic homebirth transfer, days of induction and c-section. Lilah was posterior and ended up being a good 24 hours of labor (maybe 12 of them as active, post 5 cm stage) and a whole lot of back labor, turning, nuchal hand business, and ultimately a good but challenging vaginal birth.

    I am seriously wondering if this one has a nuchal hand too, like his last ultrasound indicated, and if that is arresting his dew cent a bit during all these bouts of prodromal labor. Hmm...
    Taryl

    DD1: 4/07
    DD2: 7/08
    DS1: 10/10/10

  9. #9
    Posting Addict CaBlondie918's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    7,670

    Default

    No experience here but I had to post to say that you're siggy pic is ADORABLE!

  10. #10
    Prolific Poster
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    1,782

    Default

    1. 1 day of prodromal labor, followed by active labor about 5am the next day...DD1 born at 8:44pm. So 12+ hours of labor.

    2. Woke up at around 3am with mild contractions, DD2 born at 8am - About 5 hours, but I don't know how long I was contracting while I was sleeping.

    3. Contractions started around 7pm - very inconsistent. Things picked up around 9-9:30pm. DD3 born at 2:46am - about 8 hours total, 5.5hours of active labor.

    I agree that baby's position can change length of labor. DD1 was also asynclitic, and I was also stuck at a 5 for 6 hours. It wasn't until AROM that I went from 5-10cm in 1.5 hours. DD2 & 3 were in much better positions to start, plus I knew what needed to be done for a quicker labor (I was better at relaxing myself and changing positions).
    ~Lorna

    Lilypie Fourth Birthday tickers Lilypie Second Birthday tickers Lilypie First Birthday tickers

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
v -->

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Terms & Conditions