The actress, identified as a Texas resident of Asian descent, claims she looks a lot younger than she is, and so she had always been careful about keeping her given name and birthdate confidential. As an unknown, she used an Americanized stage name in 2003 when she first listed herself on imdb.com, a listing which she said brought her several jobs.
But in 2008, she tried to advance her career by signing up for a subscription service with the website called IMDb Pro. The service is designed for entertainment industry professionals. It provides contact information and other details for the actors, actresses, directors and others listed.
She provided credit card information — and her real name — when she bought the service, according to the lawsuit filed last week in U.S. District Court against Seattle-based IMDb and its parent company, Amazon.com. IMDb used that information to uncover her date of birth, which also isn't disclosed, and added it to her profile on the website, "revealing to the public that Plaintiff is many years older than she looks," the lawsuit says.
"If one is perceived to be `over-the-hill,' i.e., approaching 40, it is nearly impossible for an up-and-coming actress, such as the plaintiff, to get work as she is thought to have less of an `upside,'" the claim said.
She claims she never consented to having the personal information she provided used for anything but the commercial transaction. IMDb refused to remove the reference to the woman's age from her profile when asked, the lawsuit said.
Through spokeswoman Mary Osako, Amazon declined to comment, saying it never discusses litigation. An email seeking comment from IMDb wasn't immediately returned Tuesday.
The profiles of many actors and actresses on the website list their dates of birth.
The lawsuit claimed the woman wants to remain anonymous "based on fear of retaliation from defendants that would result in further damage and economic injury." John W. Dozier Jr., a Glen Allen, Va., attorney who represents the actress, said Friday that Amazon and IMDb know who she is based on prior communications from her. He declined to provide further identifying details.
IMDb claimed to have obtained the birthdate from the actress's agent, Dozier said, but "we're comfortable they didn't get it from the source they say they got it from."
A key issue in the case will be whether IMDb is immune from liability under the Communications Decency Act, Dozier said. The act ensures that providers of interactive computer services — think Google — will not be liable for defamatory information published by another content provider.
If IMDb is publishing research it itself has done on the personal details of actors and actresses, it should not be immune from lawsuits, he said.
"The implications of this are that it may put at risk the very existence of the database," he said. "The number of claims that could be asserted against them would overwhelm them."
While the actress is losing opportunities because of her age, she's also missing work because of her youthful appearance, the lawsuit says.
"Plaintiff has experienced rejection in the industry for each `40-year-old' role for which she has interviewed because she does not and cannot physically portray the role of a 40-year-old woman," the lawsuit says.
The actress is seeking $1 million or more in punitive damages as well as $75,000 or more in compensatory damages. She accuses Amazon and IMDb of breach of contract, fraud, and violation of privacy and consumer protection laws.
Does she have a right to keep her age private? Is she just a vain washed-up loser trying to get one last payday? Or does she make a good case about agism in Hollywood?
Last edited by Spacers; 10-25-2011 at 05:26 PM.
Join the revolution & take back our holidays!
Change Black Friday into Buy Nothing Day, and don't take your credit cards to work on Cyber Monday.
Shift Your Shopping from mass marketers & big box stores to your local independent retailers & small artisans.
Practice a Buy Nothing Christmas. Instead of buying more things, give gifts of your time, your energy, and maybe even some unwanted things around your home; organize a used items gift swap among your family and/or friends.
I think she makes a good point about ageism in Hollywood, though not knowing who this actress is, makes it hard to see if her claims of 'looking young' are accurate or not.
I'm not sure if she has a case though. I think it totally depends on how the site got her information, and what kind of waiver she 'checked' when she signed up with them.
Mom to Arianna (5), Conner (3) and Trent (my baby)
How is she going to prove where they got her birthdate? All they have to say is her agent did verbally and they're off the hook.
How does she think she was going to keep it secret if she's becoming famous? There are entirely too many people with time on their hands that will look that stuff up for it to have been kept under wraps for too long.
I do think you have a right to privacy to an extent, but trying to hide your age in the movie industry is like trying to hide your gender in a porno. Totally silly.
Laurie, mom to:
Nathaniel ( 10 ) and Juliet ( 6 )
Baking Adventures In A Messy Kitchen (blog)
Isn't a birthdate a part of open records anyhow?
She makes a point about ageism, but that is the industry. Is hollywood going to institute an age affirmative action hiring policy supported by the SAG union? I really don't think so.
I don't think knowing her age is an issue if she looks younger than she is. Look at 90210....half those kids were in the late 20's (some 30's) when they played teenagers. Cory Monteith from Glee is 30 or almost 30. It is just casting and I am not sure how she can prove that because they published her birthdate she lost jobs.