Because no one can resist the allure of another BF debate.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Because no one can resist the allure of another BF debate.

  1. #1
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    14,461

    Default Because no one can resist the allure of another BF debate.

    Forest Park Restricts Public Breast Feeding


    WSB-TV
    Posted: 6:09 am EDT May 17, 2011
    Updated: 7:08 am EDT May 17, 2011

    FOREST PARK, Ga. -- A new law in metro Atlanta will limit breast feeding in public.
    On Monday night, Forest Park passed a public indecency ordinance to prevent public nudity. Previously, the city only had a public indecency ordinance that covered adult entertainment businesses.
    According to the law, no woman can breast feed anyone older than 2 years old in public. City manager John Parker called the law a proactive step.
    “It sets up a process whereby we can try to control nudity throughout the entire city," Parker said.
    Copyright 2011 by WSBTV.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
    http://www.wsbtv.com/news/27920007/detail.html

    Great idea? Terrible and oppressive? Stupid in general? Brilliant?

  2. #2
    Super Poster b525's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Potter75 View Post
    http://www.wsbtv.com/news/27920007/detail.html

    Great idea? Terrible and oppressive? Stupid in general? Brilliant?
    Hmm, that's weird. So, basically they're declaring that it's not appropriate to BF over age 2. That's not technically what they're saying, but that's really what they're doing. Although I tend to feel that 2 years is plenty of (and maybe more than enough) time to BF, I'm not sure it's appropriate for them to create a law declaring it. How backward. Why do they get to decide the age?

    ETA - I should clarify that I mean FOR ME, two years was more than enough time. Kyla, I know you weren't speaking to me specifically, but it made me reread what I wrote and want to clarify. People should obviously be able to decide for themselves...
    Last edited by b525; 05-17-2011 at 09:08 PM.
    Becky

  3. #3
    Prolific Poster ftmom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,378

    Default

    So very, very wrong! I dont care what age you (general) think I should stop breastfeeding my child, it is up to me (the mother) and nobody else business! What difference does it mean to the general public? Nursing is not nudity!!!!
    Kyla
    Mom to Arianna (5), Conner (3) and Trent (my baby)

  4. #4
    Mega Poster Lemongirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,616

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ftmom View Post
    So very, very wrong! I dont care what age you (general) think I should stop breastfeeding my child, it is up to me (the mother) and nobody else business! What difference does it mean to the general public? Nursing is not nudity!!!!
    I agree completely. The comment about limiting nudity in public is interesting. I've never been to Atlanta - is there such a problem with public nudity over there that it needs to be controlled? This just seems like an insane excuse to control women breastfeeding, not nudity. Which is not something any other than than family involved has any right to control.
    ...
    Courtney
    Lilypie Third Birthday tickers

    Lilypie First Birthday tickers

  5. #5
    Posting Addict culturedmom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    9,330

    Default

    I don't think it's telling people when they should stop BF'ing. I think it's telling people when they should stop BF'ing in public. I personally don;t see why anyone would need to BF their 2 yo in public. The whole reason for BFing in public is because a baby needs to eat often. At 2, your child should be fine with eating at regular times and doesn;t need to eat right away. Not to mention when I nursed my DD at 2 1/2 she constantly popped off and ran and it was way harder to be discreet. It just seems like common sense, but whatever.

    I don't think it is brilliant and I don;t think it is necessary and would probably be against it just because of that. It's not law worthly in my book. But to get all up in arms as if it's a slight against BFing and hold signs saying I shoudl be allowed to BF'ed my 6 yo in public if I want....yeah, can't quite get that outraged.


    Oh and I do think some women BF in public in a very inappropriate way just to make a point and at times it can border on nudity. I don't think there should be a law against it, but it can absolutely be considered nudity.
    Last edited by culturedmom; 05-18-2011 at 07:26 AM.

  6. #6
    Super Poster b525's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    774

    Default

    Why is 2 the magic age? I can definitely see how someone might perceive that the law is encouraging people to be done breastfeeding by age 2. I mean, a one-year old could technically fit into the description of not needing to eat as often and being able to run off and do something else, instead. And, a one-year-old could drink a cup of milk instead of nursing, as well. I'd be interested to know what their reasoning was.

    Like Lana, I don't care enough to make a stink, but I do think it's an unnecessary law. And I think we should avoid the practice of making laws just to clarify the ones that are already in existence. It's hard to imagine they have a huge problem with nudie BFing.
    Becky

  7. #7
    Emilys4Guppies
    Guest

    Default

    There are a few times when I have breastfed my 2yo in publicv (while pregnant no less!!). When we are spending the day at the beach and I nurse him before he naps on the blanket. When we are at the outdoor bandstand for an evening performance at his usual bedtime so I nurse him from my lawn chair.

    Who are they to put a limit on this, especially when the worldwide average age of weaning is over 3 years old.

  8. #8
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    In the valley below the mountains
    Posts
    5,751

    Default

    Dumb...to me it's another example of trying to control through laws. But this is especially dumb. I don't think it's governments job to say when/where you can nurse. And while I wouldn't feel comfortable nursing a baby that age in public, I think it's ridiculous to make a law against it.
    ~Lydia~
    Married DH '97
    Mom to DS ('01), DD ('05), DD ('06), DD ('09), & DD ('11)

  9. #9
    Community Host Alissa_Sal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Debating Away on the Debate Board!
    Posts
    11,771

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lemongirl View Post
    I agree completely. The comment about limiting nudity in public is interesting. I've never been to Atlanta - is there such a problem with public nudity over there that it needs to be controlled? This just seems like an insane excuse to control women breastfeeding, not nudity. Which is not something any other than than family involved has any right to control.
    Yes, I totally agree with this. Linking it to "limiting public nudity" seems completely absurd to me.
    -Alissa, mom to Tristan (5) and Reid (the baby!)

    Got an opinion? We've got a board! Come join us for some lively debate on the Face Off! Debate Arena board.

  10. #10
    Posting Addict ClairesMommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    12,517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by runningmom View Post
    Dumb...to me it's another example of trying to control through laws. But this is especially dumb. I don't think it's governments job to say when/where you can nurse. And while I wouldn't feel comfortable nursing a baby that age in public, I think it's ridiculous to make a law against it.
    Agree. Not only that, the enforceability of a law like that is laughable. What are they going to do? Scope out the bf-ing kids to see if they look 2 years old and then demand to see a birth certificate? My DS at 2 is the size of an 18-month-old, but DD at 2 looked closer to 3. Stupid law.
    Lisa


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
v -->

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Terms & Conditions