Boy fighting to play on the Girl team
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Boy fighting to play on the Girl team

  1. #1
    Community Host wlillie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    6,469

    Default Boy fighting to play on the Girl team

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/04/26...eing-too-good/

    Since there isn't another option, should the rules be bent? Which is more important, the law concering the equal playing opportunity for both sexes, or the fact that he (I'm guesing) really is much better than his teammates/opposite team members?

  2. #2
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    5,543

    Default

    I think he is out of luck. If there isn't a boys team in his area, then he can't play.

    It might not be a big deal if he continues with the girls this year, but what about next year or in three years? There has to be a cut off at some point and whenever it is will be hard.

  3. #3
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    14,461

    Default

    I have no problem with him playing on the team. I don't see a rash of boys suddenly flocking to field hockey, especially as they would have no collegiate opportunities with it within the US.

    I played on the boys tennis team in high school, because I played field hockey in the fall and winter (it was my priority over tennis, I went on to play in college) and that is when girls tennis was. There was no girls tennis in the spring, so I was allowed to try out for, and made, the boys team. I recognize that tennis is more of an individual sport, but none the less, as someone who crossed the gender line, I can't fault others for wanting to do the same. This sport is something that this child grew up with as part of his culture, he isn't doing this for some thrill seeking thing or to prove anything. If the alternative is to disband the women's team, that is ridiculous.

    Would they kick off a woman who was "too good" or would she simply be looked at as an asset to the team? Playing with better players makes everyone better. That is a bonus, not a negative.
    Last edited by Potter75; 04-26-2012 at 03:00 PM.

  4. #4
    Posting Addict Spacers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    My avatar is the tai chi -- a symbol of the eternal cycle of life
    Posts
    16,461

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kris_w View Post
    I think he is out of luck. If there isn't a boys team in his area, then he can't play.
    Actually, the article quotes someone saying that Title IX, a federal law, says boys & girls can play a sport if a school only offers it to the opposite sex. I can't seem to make a quote from the article. If the school doesn't offer a boys' field hockey team, he's legally entitled to play on the girls team. Title IX doesn't say, only if he's not as good or only if he doesn't take a dominant role, it says he can play.

    ITA with Potter, this is a team sport, one better player can make the entire team better. Let the kid play.
    David Letterman is retiring. Such great memories of watching him over the past thirty-two years!

  5. #5
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    5,543

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spacers View Post
    Actually, the article quotes someone saying that Title IX, a federal law, says boys & girls can play a sport if a school only offers it to the opposite sex. I can't seem to make a quote from the article. If the school doesn't offer a boys' field hockey team, he's legally entitled to play on the girls team. Title IX doesn't say, only if he's not as good or only if he doesn't take a dominant role, it says he can play.

    ITA with Potter, this is a team sport, one better player can make the entire team better. Let the kid play.
    I understand that. But, since in North America field hockey is typically a "girls sport" the same issue is going to continuously come up. And at some point, as a male, he isn't going to be able to play with the girls anymore. He may not have an unfair advantage now, but as he gets older he likely will. The father even mentions that when he comments about his sons size.

    Individual sports are totally different because each person is playing on their own merit. His team might be happy to have him to improve the team, but the teams they play against might see things differently.

    But, yes, as the rule currents stands they have to let him play.

  6. #6
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    14,461

    Default

    Kris, I disagree that a man/boy playing an individual sport on a womans team like tennis is more fair. A man is going to have a huge advantage.

  7. #7
    Posting Addict ange84's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    9,061

    Default

    When my brother played football they had girls on the team, but the rules also stated they could only play until 7 or 8 on the boys team for whatever reason. If there are no rules that govern ages like this then that boy in question should be allowed to play

  8. #8
    Posting Addict Rivergallery's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    9,749

    Default

    When I was in school there was 1 girl on the hs football team, 1 boy on the girls volleyball team, and 1 girl on the wrestling team. I think it is fine for genders to mix when there is not the same sport offered for each gender.
    DH-Aug 30th 1997 Josiah - 6/3/02 Isaac 7/31/03

  9. #9
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    5,543

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Potter75 View Post
    Kris, I disagree that a man/boy playing an individual sport on a womans team like tennis is more fair. A man is going to have a huge advantage.
    Oh, I didn't explain that well. Yes, the boy/man will have an advantage, which is why I don't think sports should be mixed except at a very young age. Or if, like in your case, a girl meets the criteria to join a mens individual sport like tennis, golf, swimming, etc.

  10. #10
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    7,254

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spacers View Post
    Actually, the article quotes someone saying that Title IX, a federal law, says boys & girls can play a sport if a school only offers it to the opposite sex. I can't seem to make a quote from the article. If the school doesn't offer a boys' field hockey team, he's legally entitled to play on the girls team. Title IX doesn't say, only if he's not as good or only if he doesn't take a dominant role, it says he can play.

    ITA with Potter, this is a team sport, one better player can make the entire team better. Let the kid play.
    This. Gender equality goes both ways. There would be quite an outrage if they were trying to kick a female linebacker off the football team because she was too good. Was Kobe kicked off his HS basketball team because he dominated?

    He deserves to be reinstated.

    OT: When I was in HS we had to do a 3-week unit on all the different sports for PE. Field hockey was the one thing I loved! I wish we had had a team or something other than the 3 weeks.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
v -->

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Terms & Conditions