Does HPV vaccine promote promiscuity?
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Does HPV vaccine promote promiscuity?

  1. #1
    Posting Addict ClairesMommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    12,517

    Default Does HPV vaccine promote promiscuity?

    HPV vaccine ban by Calgary bishop putting girls’ lives at risk, doctors say | News | National Post

    Staring down the edict of a Calgary bishop who says the HPV vaccine contributes to promiscuity, a newly formed advocacy group is pushing Roman Catholic schools to allow students to be immunized against the sexually transmitted virus. Calgary is the only major city in Canada with a publicly funded school board that withholds the vaccine on religious grounds, the group says. This puts the thousands of girls in the city and southern Alberta at risk of cervical cancer.

    The activists, who include ethicists and doctors, have formed HPV Calgary in an attempt to strong-arm the Calgary Catholic School District into allowing vaccinations in Grades 5 and 9 with other routine shots. After more than a year of correspondence with the school board, they went public Monday and are calling on trustees to discuss the issue by Saturday.

    ?In the letters from the physicians to the trustees, the word ?children? is used three times at least per letter. In the letters of response from the trustees they use the word ?bishop? three times per letter,? said Juliet Guichon, an assistant professor in community health sciences at the University of Calgary.

    ?They have delegated their decision making to a non-elected official without expertise in evidence-based medicine or public health.?

    The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, called Gardasil, prevents the four strains of the sexually transmitted virus that most commonly lead to cervical cancer. Social conservatives oppose the vaccine, arguing it promotes promiscuity and implicitly condones premarital sex. In 2007, Ottawa provided a grant so that school-aged girls could be vaccinated for free; Alberta followed suit. But at least eight religious boards in the province still bar the vaccine from being administered on school grounds. Outside the province, only two school boards are believed to have taken such a stance.

    Dr. Ian Mitchell, a professor of pediatrics and a bioethicist with the University of Calgary, said HPV Calgary tried to present the latest evidence supporting the vaccine to the board, with no success.

    ?If you are an immigrant, if you are not so affluent, if you don?t have a car, if you?re very dependent on an hourly wage, it is very unlikely that you?ll get immunization,? he said. ?So we saw this decision by the Catholic school board as affecting all children, but really affecting the most vulnerable children.?

    The resistance can be traced to a 2008 edict from Bishop Frederick Henry of Calgary and other Alberta bishops.
    In addition to a letter from Alberta Health Services providing information about Gardasil and where to get vaccinated, Catholic school students were sent home with a letter from the six bishops advising parents to protect their children from ?counterproductive influences and potential abuse.?

    ?Although school-based immunization delivery systems generally result in high numbers of students completing immunization, a school-based approach to vaccination sends a message that early sexual intercourse is allowed, as long as one uses ?protection,? ? it said.

    Not every school board agrees. After the Edmonton Catholic board allowed girls at its schools to be vaccinated, nearly 70% of them took up the offer. By comparison, the rate among girls in Calgary?s Catholic schools is 18.9%.
    Federal health officials had once hoped as many as 90% of girls would be vaccinated. Results have so far been lacklustre: Ottawa has the highest rate, with 75% of eligible girls receiving the first of three doses during the 2010-11 school year.

    Mary Martin, chairwoman of the Catholic board in Calgary, said students receive information about where they can get the vaccine outside school.

    ?The overarching concern or issue here is that anything we do within our Catholic schools have to be congruent with the teachings of our church,? she said. ?At the end of the day [we?re providing] a faith-based education that is in alignment with the direction of the Alberta bishops.?

    Vaccination advocates said studies have found no correlation between the HPV vaccine and increased promiscuity.

    ?What we see anecdotally is that the children don?t jump into bed, they go out for recess. It?s hard to debate this because it?s not grounded in evidence or rationality,? Ms. Guichon said.

    Further, it?s possible to contract HPV through sexual assault and abuse, she added.
    Bolding is mine. Not necessarily targeting the RC Church because I think this belief is shared by a wider segment of the population. Do you think that the vaccine does or could directly lead to increased sexual activity at a younger age?

  2. #2
    Community Host
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    13,521

    Default

    While I do not think it should be required, I do not think it leads to promiscuousness. There are so many consequences to sex that lowering the risk of one is not going to change things. I don't know about you all but at 16 in the heat of the moment deciding if I was going to have sex or not, I was not thinking of cervical cancer. I was thinking of pregnancy mostly along with AIDS and other STDS. Taking away one risk factor is not going to make kids think nothing willl happen if they have sex.

    ~Bonita~

  3. #3
    Posting Addict ClairesMommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    12,517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AlyssaEimers View Post
    While I do not think it should be required, I do not think it leads to promiscuousness. There are so many consequences to sex that lowering the risk of one is not going to change things. I don't know about you all but at 16 in the heat of the moment deciding if I was going to have sex or not, I was not thinking of cervical cancer. I was thinking of pregnancy mostly along with AIDS and other STDS. Taking away one risk factor is not going to make kids think nothing willl happen if they have sex.
    It's not required, just available as part of the routine vaxes offered for free at school. Parents can opt their daughter out of the HPV vax if they desire.

  4. #4
    Community Host Alissa_Sal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Debating Away on the Debate Board!
    Posts
    11,771

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AlyssaEimers View Post
    While I do not think it should be required, I do not think it leads to promiscuousness. There are so many consequences to sex that lowering the risk of one is not going to change things. I don't know about you all but at 16 in the heat of the moment deciding if I was going to have sex or not, I was not thinking of cervical cancer. I was thinking of pregnancy mostly along with AIDS and other STDS. Taking away one risk factor is not going to make kids think nothing willl happen if they have sex.
    I agree with this. It actually disgusts me that a religious organization would want to with hold preventative medicine to girls that could literally save their lives, because they want to keep the threat of cervical cancer hanging over girls' heads, should they consider becoming sexually active. Am I alone in thinking that is plain out vicious?
    -Alissa, mom to Tristan (5) and Reid (the baby!)

    Got an opinion? We've got a board! Come join us for some lively debate on the Face Off! Debate Arena board.

  5. #5
    Posting Addict ClairesMommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    12,517

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alissa_Sal View Post
    I agree with this. It actually disgusts me that a religious organization would want to with hold preventative medicine to girls that could literally save their lives, because they want to keep the threat of cervical cancer hanging over girls' heads, should they consider becoming sexually active. Am I alone in thinking that is plain out vicious?
    You are not alone. At first I thought it was very head-in-the-sand, but then I started thinking like you. Wow, this makes me so indignant. If the RC Church supports (albeit reluctantly) the use of condoms to prevent the spread of HIV, why would the protection of girls (who are going to likely engage in unprotected sex at some point in their lives) against another potentially deadly virus. And not just girls, boys too. I shake my head. I think it's pathetic.

  6. #6
    Mega Poster mom3girls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,432

    Default

    I do not think it leads to promiscuity.
    Lisa
    Molly, Morgan, Mia and Carson

  7. #7
    Prolific Poster
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,219

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AlyssaEimers View Post
    While I do not think it should be required, I do not think it leads to promiscuousness. There are so many consequences to sex that lowering the risk of one is not going to change things. I don't know about you all but at 16 in the heat of the moment deciding if I was going to have sex or not, I was not thinking of cervical cancer. I was thinking of pregnancy mostly along with AIDS and other STDS. Taking away one risk factor is not going to make kids think nothing willl happen if they have sex.
    I agree with this completely.

  8. #8
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    5,543

    Default

    I am not a fan of this vaccine, but not because I think it promotes promiscuity.

    I do remember some of my more conservative family members saying that about the Hep B shot when it was first introduced and given in grade 6. I got the vax but my cousins didn't.

  9. #9
    Posting Addict ClairesMommy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    12,517

    Default

    What bothers me the most is that this one person, with no medical training or expertise, takes public funds and has the audacity to believe he knows what's best for the health of these girls.

  10. #10
    Posting Addict GloriaInTX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    7,595

    Default

    Do I think in promotes promiscuity? No

    Do I think these Catholic schools should have the option of whether or not to offer it to students at school? Absolutely

    It is a school, not a health clinic. It's strange none of my kids got any shots at school. No schools in this area give shots. If you want a shot go to a health clinic.
    Mom to Lee, Jake, Brandon, Rocco
    Stepmom to Ryan, Regan, Braden, Baley
    Granddaughters Kylie 10/18/2010 & Aleya 4/22/2013


    I never consider a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosopy, as a cause for withdrawing from a friend. --Thomas Jefferson

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
v -->

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Terms & Conditions