I can't seem to be able to cut & paste the whole thing. Here's the article:
Ferguson grand juror sues over gag order
In Missouri, nine of the twelve grand jurors must agree to indict, and state law prohibits grand jurors from speaking about the cases they review. The grand juror behind this lawsuit believes that "the current information available about the grand jurors' views is not entirely accurate -- especially the implication that all grand jurors believed that there was no support for any charges. Moreover, the public characterization of the grand jurors' view of witnesses and evidence does not accord with Plaintiff's own."
What do you think? Should the Ferguson grand jurors be allowed to speak publicly? Do you think it really matters whether this one grand juror disagrees since at least three of his/her fellow jurors also had to agree not to indict?