HIV executive order - Page 2
+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: HIV executive order

  1. #11
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    23,442

    Default

    Yep, I was tested for it as well. I also was tested for it when I got my Green Card, but they test you for a LOT of stuff, which makes sense.

    I think the idea here is that they'd add it to things they test for, not mandate that everyone show up at their doctor's office and hand over a blood sample.

    I don't see why it would be a bad thing to add to the recommendations list. It's an epidemic, and while it is a greater concern for gay men statistically, it can still spread to other people, and it's a life-threatening disease. I don't see what's bad about adding it to the list of things to screen for.

    I don't see it as a big deal. Are there any diseases that they force you to test for here? If that's the question then it's not about AIDS, it's about any sort of mandatory screening, right?
    Laurie, mom to:
    Nathaniel ( 10 ) and Juliet ( 6 )




    Baking Adventures In A Messy Kitchen (blog)

  2. #12
    Prolific Poster ftmom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,378

    Default

    I have been tested for it with every pregnancy, and a few other times as well. My husband occasionally deals with other peoples bodily fluids, and gets tested occasionally, I have in between then gotten tested when we are planning a pregnancy, cause even though it is unlikely he would contract it that way, it is possible, and then it is possible to give it to a baby. It isnt the only thing I get tested for, just to make sure. I dont see the big deal with recommending it. I cant think of any medical procedure I have ever been forced into, let alone testing.
    Kyla
    Mom to Arianna (5), Conner (3) and Trent (my baby)

  3. #13
    Posting Addict Spacers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    My avatar is the tai chi -- a symbol of the eternal cycle of life
    Posts
    16,468

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ftmom View Post
    Thats not what I'm reading at all. Just that they are recommending it, and part of the task forces job is to find ways to encourage at risk populations to have that testing.

    Obamacare should actually help encourage people to be tested and treated, because they cant be denied coverage if they come back positive, while they can be with private insurance.
    ITA with this. I don't think HIV testing would ever become mandatory, even under Obamacare. First, it's simply not cost effective. Only 0.36% of the U.S. population is HIV+ so we'd be testing 99.64% of the population that doesn't need it, and that's horribly wasteful. Also, because your negative status has the potential to change after every sexual encounter or bodily fluid exchange, mandatory testing would have to be done a regular & frequent basis to provide any meaningful results. I simply can't see testing all 315 million Americans on an annual basis, or more, just to find the estimated 250,000 that are believed to be HIV+ and not know it. That would be an insane amount of cost, and time for the lab techs, and it would probably bog down the testing system to the point where results are delayed so long they are no longer valid.

    But sure, I'll play along and assume that mandatory testing somehow got passed. I think that's a good thing, because everyone *should* know their HIV status. Not knowing puts yourself at risk, it puts your sexual partners at risk, it puts your future children at risk, and it puts everyone close enough to you to help you put on a bandaid, or whom you would help put on a bandaid, at risk. Not knowing costs our society hundreds of millions of dollars in healthcare costs that could be easily avoided if more people knew their HIV status. As long as confidentiality laws remain in place, I see no harm, and the potential for a lot of good, from making sure that everyone knows their HIV status on a regular basis. It never made any sense to me why the state wanted to test me for rubella before I got married, but didn't care if my husband passed HIV to me.
    Last edited by Spacers; 07-19-2013 at 04:49 PM. Reason: someHOW not someONE
    David Letterman is retiring. Such great memories of watching him over the past thirty-two years!

  4. #14
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    23,442

    Default

    I don't think we want to live in a country that forces everybody to march to a clinic or hospital and give a blood sample for testing for anything, do we?

    You can add it to a standard screening, that makes a lot more sense. But there would be mass outrage, and rightly so, if the government started telling every citizen of a certain age to go hand over a sample.

    And I didn't have to do any kind of blood test before getting married! Do they still do that? I've been married for almost 12 years.
    Laurie, mom to:
    Nathaniel ( 10 ) and Juliet ( 6 )




    Baking Adventures In A Messy Kitchen (blog)

  5. #15
    Posting Addict Spacers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    My avatar is the tai chi -- a symbol of the eternal cycle of life
    Posts
    16,468

    Default

    I got married in 1994 and California still had mandatory blood tests at that time but I think only a handful of states still have them now. We got a "confidential" license which required stating that we already lived together, and blood tests and witnesses weren't necessary. We did get HIV testing on our own, though. I also did it with both pregnancies, even though I trusted that DH had been faithful to me, I didn't want my kids to pay the price for it if he hadn't.
    David Letterman is retiring. Such great memories of watching him over the past thirty-two years!

  6. #16
    Prolific Poster
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,219

    Default

    I got married in 2003 and we had to have blood work but it's not required anymore.

    I am not on board for mandatory testing at all but that's not what this is.
    Mom to Elizabeth (6) and Corinne (4)

  7. #17
    Community Host
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    13,521

    Default

    Sorry for posting this and then leaving. I have been out at a curriculum fair all day.

    Last night my FB wall was blown up with outrage over this saying that the testing was now mandatory. Reading the actual article myself, I do not see where it says that it is required. (I could be missing something) I was tested with each of my pregnancies, but I would guess I could opt out if I wanted to. It does not bother me in any way for there to be a recommendation to have testing done, but I would be very against making it mandatory.

    ~Bonita~

  8. #18
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    14,461

    Default

    Blllllllaaaahhhhhh death camps!!!!!!!!!!!!

  9. #19
    Posting Addict Rivergallery's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    9,756

    Default

    As far as getting married, I am not sure that we got blood tested or not.. it was in 97.. is it a federal or state mandate? And.. if one has HIV or AIDS are they then not allowed to get married? What is the point of the test?
    DH-Aug 30th 1997 Josiah - 6/3/02 Isaac 7/31/03

  10. #20
    Posting Addict fuchsiasky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    British Columbia
    Posts
    5,925

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mom2robbie View Post
    I know here they recommend it in cases of rape and with pregnancy. With our fertility treatments both Sean and I had to be tested.

    I don't think they would ever make HIV testing mandatory in Canada.
    It was part of the regular pregnancy testing process for me. They didn't even ask they just put it on the first round of bloodwork. I see no reason to refuse.

    I don't think they would ever make it mandatory here either. But there is a push in BC to have everyone tested. It is reasonable to me if we want to make sure those who need it get treatment as soon as possible.
    Me- Fuchsia
    My Wonderful Partner - Rob
    DD - December 17 2008
    DSD 15
    DSS 18
    Feline Furbabies - Sophie and Indigo

    Little Babe 22/12/05


+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
v -->

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Terms & Conditions