Medicating instead of Disciplining?
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Medicating instead of Disciplining?

  1. #1
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    14,461

    Default Medicating instead of Disciplining?

    From the book "Why Gender Matters"

    "In a bizzare turn of events it has become politically incorrct to spank your child, but ok to drug him.

    Something fundamental has changed. There has been a transformation in the way we think about children throughout most of history in western civilization, parents have assumed that children are inclined to misbehavior. This assumption is manifest in the Calvinist doctrine of total depravity, in the Catholic church doctrine of original sin, and the Jewish belief of yetzer hara, the evil impulse. The role of parents it was thought- was to guide kids along the straight and narrow. Without strict parenting, children were innately inclined to misbehave. Or such was the common belief.

    Today the dominant ethos reflects the 1960's flower child belief in the innate goodness of children. Children are born good, according to this world view. If kids behave badly it much be because of: bad parenting, poor nutrition, lack of prenatal care, environmental toxins, ADD, violent entertainment and media.

    Take your pick. Even the language used be parents and professional to describe the disobedient child has changed. Fifty years ago a boy who stole from other kids was a "thief" Today he's a boy exhibiting : adolescent conduct disorder with maladaptive social functioning." The change in language results from a change in the way people thing about juvenile misbehavior. Fifty years ago, bad behavior was considered a disciplinary problem. If you misbehaved, you needed to be punished. Today bad behavior is more often considered a psychiatric problem. Kid's who misbehave are referred to a specialist for a diagnosis- and for treatment often with medication.

    And psychiatrists have plenty of diagnoses at their disposal. The most recent addition of the DSM-IV, lists half a dozen "diagnoses" that could be applied to plain old disobedience. Consider the official description of "Oppositional Defiant Disorder," DSM-IV 313.81:

    The essential feature of ODD is the recurrent pattern of negativistic, defiant, disobedient and hostile behavior towards authority figures that persists for at least 6 months and is characterized by the frequent occurrence of at least 4 of the following behaviors: Losing temper, arguing with adults, actively defying or refusing to comply with the requests or rules of adults, deliberately doing things that will annoy other people, blaming others for his or her own mistakes and misbehavior, being touchy or easily annoyed by others, being angry or resentful, or being spiteful and vindictive. .......

    Parents who would balk at drugging their children for misbehavior would be much more comfortable doing it as a method of treatment. I call this process the "Medicalization of misbehavior."
    Do you agree with the bolded statement?

    Also, do you agree with the concept that children are "born good" and misbehavior results from some sort of parental or societal failure? Do you think that a lack of parental willingness to discipline children has resulted in the overwhelming increase in the diagnosis of psychiatric problems in children?

    Anything else you find debate worthy in this piece?

  2. #2
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    6,930

    Default

    Interesting debate.

    I'm not sure that children are "born good." I think they're born with unique personalities for sure. Personalities that are shaped by their genetics and experiences. Their misbehavior can be the result of many things, and for most kids I don't think we'll ever know why they do the bad things they do. Are some people just terrible parents that lack the skills to raise a child? Sure. Are others just looking to blame someone or something else for their child's unruly ways? Of course. But there are also kids with genuine disorders (ODD, ADHD, Autism, etc.) and the cause of their disorder and subsequent behaviors will always be a mystery.

    Can't wait to see what everyone else has to say!

  3. #3
    Posting Addict culturedmom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    9,330

    Default

    I think children are over medicated and over perscribed. Are there kids who need it?Absolutely. But I do think that many parents are willing to medicate before anything else and are quick to label their kid in order to medicate them.

  4. #4
    Posting Addict Spacers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    My avatar is the tai chi -- a symbol of the eternal cycle of life
    Posts
    16,568

    Default

    ITA with that bolded statement. Most kids I know IRL whose parents say are OCD or ADD or whatever are ineffective, neglectful and/or lazy parents, and IMHO that's the #1 reason why their kids aren't good. They don't discipline their children very well (and I'm using this in the "teach" way not the "punish" way) and they let them have too much uncontrolled screen time rather than engage with them and they feed them a bunch of crap because it's fast & easy, and then they wonder why Johnny can't behave at school. So they dump drugs down him instead of cleaning up their kid's body & environment, or actually being a parent & making him do a few things he doesn't like, oh boohoo. Are there kids who truly need medication? Yes, but I'd guess it's easily the minority of those who are actually getting medication because it's an easier fix than being a good parent.

    And I do believe that children are born good. I can't believe that a child could be born bad, and the argument that they are neutral & must be influenced one way or the other doesn't ring true to me; the unconditional love I felt from my minutes-old newborn wasn't neutral in any way.
    The number of U.S. states in which a person can marry the person they love regardless of gender: 30 and counting!

  5. #5
    Prolific Poster ftmom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,378

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spacers View Post
    ITA with that bolded statement. Most kids I know IRL whose parents say are OCD or ADD or whatever are ineffective, neglectful and/or lazy parents, and IMHO that's the #1 reason why their kids aren't good. They don't discipline their children very well (and I'm using this in the "teach" way not the "punish" way) and they let them have too much uncontrolled screen time rather than engage with them and they feed them a bunch of crap because it's fast & easy, and then they wonder why Johnny can't behave at school. So they dump drugs down him instead of cleaning up their kid's body & environment, or actually being a parent & making him do a few things he doesn't like, oh boohoo. Are there kids who truly need medication? Yes, but I'd guess it's easily the minority of those who are actually getting medication because it's an easier fix than being a good parent.
    I think this is pretty harsh. It is often hard to tell if the parenting is a result of the childs behavior or if the behavior is the result of the parenting style. For example, if you have a very difficult child who fights you on everything you would probably be more likely to let them get their way and watch TV more because you need to pick your battles. Likewise if you have a child who doesnt talk, you may get in the habit of letting him eat whatever he wants as long as he says the words and asks for it.

    I am actually pretty appalled that you would judge another parent on the way they choose to parent IF you are not intimately knowledgeable with how their parenting 'style' evolved. (I say if, because you could be referring to a family that you know very well, but it sounds like you are speaking in generalities)
    Kyla
    Mom to Arianna (5), Conner (3) and Trent (my baby)

  6. #6
    Posting Addict Strange_Cat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    6,015

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Spacers View Post
    ITA with that bolded statement. Most kids I know IRL whose parents say are OCD or ADD or whatever are ineffective, neglectful and/or lazy parents, and IMHO that's the #1 reason why their kids aren't good.
    Wow. Medical experts agree that ADD is a neurological condition that has heavy genetic predisposition. ADD often runs in families, and studies have shown that even wonderful parenting won't stop the child from having the disorder. Poor parenting can make behavior worse, but it's not going to cause a child to have the problem from the get go.

    http://www.everydayhealth.com/adhd/e...-and-adhd.aspx
    http://health.more4kids.info/2008/01/adhd-and-genetics/


    On another note: One of my employees has an autistic son, and ignorant idiots have told HER that it's all because of her bad parenting and lack of discipline, too.
    Alison

  7. #7
    Posting Addict carg0612's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    5,274

    Default

    Nature vs. nurture debate?

    I am of the opinion that we are all a result of a combination of the two. I do believe there are children with diagnosable problems that need medical intervention. I think we all have a natural disposition. But I also think that our natural disposition can be altered, augmented, shaped given our nurturing environment.

    In other words I think we are all born with tendencies but what we do with those tendencies has a large interdependency on how we are raised.

    As a mom of 2 step sons (and 3 biological children) I have some first hand experience with what both nature and nurture have to offer. There is a noticable behavior pattern my DSS's fall into after they've been with their mother who does not know how to discipline effectively. After they have had time with us their behavior improves. We work very hard at consistency and positive attention.

    I have also seen my DSS#1 be so negative it's, well, a little scary. Frankly, he is just that way. A born pessimist I guess (his mother also exhibits this trait). But with our coaching and encouraging he works to turn that negativity into a more positive response. And from that his negativity doesn't go away but does move in a more positive direction.

    So I don't think there's a "one size fits all" answer to this. As each human and human experience is different so could each human's behavioral answer be different.
    Christina + Rory = a grand total of:
    Amelia, Anthony, Andon, Noah, Mason, & Trinity-woof


  8. #8
    Posting Addict Alissa_Sal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Debating Away on the Debate Board!
    Posts
    11,770

    Default

    I agree with Christina. I think that every person is a combo of the interplay of nature and nurture. I also think it's really harsh to presume that most kids who have ADD or OCD or other problems just have lame parents. Until you've walked a mile in those shoes, you know? From what I remember from my psych classes, most problems (depression, OCD, ADD, et cetera) have some physical basis. That's not to say that environment, diet, parenting styles, et cetera have no bearing on the situation, but again, it's an interplay.

    Having said that, I will say that ideally I think that long term medical interventions should be fairly far down on the list of options. I do say "long term" because I know that in the case of depression particularly sometimes a short term run of anti-depressants is very effective in dealing with the chemical aspects of depression while giving the patient room to work on the environmental/lifestyle issues, so I suspect that the same could hold true for other issues (ADD, OCD). A short term run of meds might be helpful while the child adjusts to more the more environmental changes. But overall, I would like to see diet/environment/parenting type changes implemented BEFORE the decision to put a child on long term meds.
    -Alissa, mom to Tristan (5) and Reid (the baby!)

    Got an opinion? We've got a board! Come join us for some lively debate on the Face Off! Debate Arena board.

  9. #9
    Prolific Poster ftmom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,378

    Default

    I agree that most of these things are a combo of nature and nurture. The problem as I see it for many of these kids is that once they reach school age their parents are no longer their primary caregivers/teachers. So while a parent may have been able to adapt the environment to the child and help them learn effectively as a preschooler, that same child is expected to fit into a one size fits all school system. That is often the point where medication etc starts getting recommended, because it is not always possible to adapt the classroom to the child. I actually see that as more of the problem then anything else. In the past there were more options in terms of trades etc that were recommended for kids who didnt learn well in the classroom, and as much as Im not sure that streaming children at a young age was a good idea, I think it did help alot of these kids find there place.

    I think that in our industrialized society most people see school smart as the only kind of smart and so we force a level of education on kids that we didnt in the past. They probably need it in our society too.

    I hope that made sence. Kinda thinking as I go. Oh, and not knocking teachers. I am one
    Kyla
    Mom to Arianna (5), Conner (3) and Trent (my baby)

  10. #10
    Posting Addict Spacers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    My avatar is the tai chi -- a symbol of the eternal cycle of life
    Posts
    16,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ftmom View Post
    I think this is pretty harsh. It is often hard to tell if the parenting is a result of the childs behavior or if the behavior is the result of the parenting style. For example, if you have a very difficult child who fights you on everything you would probably be more likely to let them get their way and watch TV more because you need to pick your battles. Likewise if you have a child who doesnt talk, you may get in the habit of letting him eat whatever he wants as long as he says the words and asks for it.

    I am actually pretty appalled that you would judge another parent on the way they choose to parent IF you are not intimately knowledgeable with how their parenting 'style' evolved. (I say if, because you could be referring to a family that you know very well, but it sounds like you are speaking in generalities)
    Like I said, I know several families in real life, and that I've known long enough to feel confident in saying this, whose lack of parenting is either the reason for their child's troubled behavior, or the reason why it's become a problem. I'm not disputing that there are kids out there with real diagnoses, but I suspect that many of those diagnoses wouldn't be there if those parents were more effective.

    For example, there's a boy at school who has had a few run-ins with my daughter; his mom says he's seeing a therapist for "attachment issues" and is on anxiety medication. His mom travels on business a lot even though she admits she doesn't always *have* to, she likes flying & staying in nice hotels on someone else's dime. She recently left him (age 6) alone at home with a series of babysitters for 16 days; granted, some of that time was a business trip, but she added personal travel at the beginning & end. I told her that, if it were me with a child who has attachment issues and anxiety, I would keep my trip as short as possible and the number of babysitters as few as possible. The mom says it's OK because kids are adaptable; most kids are, some aren't, and the fact that hers has attachment problems and anxiety indicates that her parenting style isn't really working for him, don't you think?

    Here's another: My SIL (the one who openly states that she hates being a parent) wonders why her DD was recently diagnosed as OCD; maybe it's because she pretty much raises her DD like someone might raise a cat -- she provides food & shelter, but otherwise pretty much ignores her DD. She never held her as a baby (poor kid literally spent her infancy in a carseat or swing) she never plays with her, the only stimulation the kid gets is videos, she never takes her DD to a park to learn how to interact with other kids, her DD is four & still not potty-trained & refuses to talk to anyone except SIL & MIL. I could rattle off at least half a dozen examples of families I know IRL who aren't this extreme, but whose children have a diagnosis of something and whose parenting makes you go hmmmmm.... In fact, I can't think of one single child I know who has what could be called problem behavior who does have parents who do set limits, enforce rules, set good examples, etc.

    And then there are the parents who don't have a diagnosis but want one. My sister has for the past three years tried to get her son on ADD medication, she's even switched peds a few times trying to find someone to do it, but she hasn't cut out the junk food, she hasn't cut out the violent video games, she hasn't enrolled him in any kind of activity to channel his excess energy, the only thing she wants to have to do is give him a pill. And again, I can think of about half a dozen families where the parents go on & on about their kids' poor behavior, and wonder what is wrong with them that the doctor has missed, and I have to wonder how their kids would behave if maybe they didn't drink a liter of soda or have their face in a screen all day or were just told no once in a while. Yeah, it's judging. I'm pretty appalled that people do this to their kids.
    The number of U.S. states in which a person can marry the person they love regardless of gender: 30 and counting!

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
v -->

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Terms & Conditions