Here are some key excerpts:
An Ohio woman is suing her ex-husband after she said he spied on her with a hidden video camera, microphone and a GPS for months in their home.
Cathy Zang learned about the recordings during their 2009 divorce proceedings after 14 years of marriage, according to the Cincinnati Enquirer. Her ex-husband, Joe Zang, a homebuilder in Ohio, admitted to installing all the equipment, but denied doing anything wrong, according to court documents.
After learning of the secret recordings, Cathy Zang searched her home and found numerous recording devices.
"He [Joe Zang] put small microphones and small cameras in wall outlets and disguised them as actual wall outlets. It's a complete view of the computer area, the kitchen area, the living room area," said Cathy Zang's attorney, Don Roberts.
While the Zangs' divorce is now final and out of court, the recordings are at the center of a federal court battle over the right to privacy amidst 21st century technology. Two lawsuits are now pending in U.S. District Court that involve nearly a dozen of the former couple's friends and family and a computer monitoring software company, as first reported by the Cincinnati Enquirer.
One suit was filed by Javier Luis, a Florida man whose online conversations with Cathy Zang were monitored, while the other was filed by Zang herself. Both lawsuits seek hundreds of thousands of dollars for wiretapping and invasion of privacy, the Enquirer reports.
"He was hacking into my personal computer account and getting into my e-mail. At some point he had a GPS on my car," Cathy Zang told ABC News.
"There are some embarrassing things that I wouldn't want other people to see because I was in the privacy of my own home," she said.
It's not clear what laws Joe Zang has broken since he installed the devices in his own home.
"What do you do when both people pay the bills? When both people's names are on the deed? When both people share the same computer, purchased it together? It's very difficult for a prosecutor then to say, well you have committed a crime against this other person," said legal analyst Sunny Hostin, a former federal prosecutor.
Ohio and federal wiretapping laws permit audio recording as long as one of the parties in the conversation is aware of the recording.
What do you think? Should this be legal? Is it any different than installed "security" cameras, those hidden to watch the babysitter, or others working in your home?
What if the wife had installed hidden cameras to document spousal or child abuse? What if one partner was suspected of cheating -- does the "innocent" partner have the right to place cameras, keylogging software, etc. in the home that is shared by both?