I dont think that vouchers would necessarily invite government interference. If they are just giving you money that you paid in taxes back, to help pay for your childs education they you use the money how you would like to use it
Lisa
Molly, Morgan, Mia and Carson
That tax money is supposed to support local public schooling so the government does get a say in what is taught and when. You bring tax dollars into a religious school and the same thing will happen. You can't have it both ways.
Here there are a few different options within the public system. We are a small district with 7ish elementary schools (not positive on how many rural schools we have) and we have a French as a Second Language school and a school based on Project Based Learning. You have to send your child to the school they are zoned for, unless you send them to one of those schools. It is nice to have a few different options though, and like I said, we are a small district, larger towns and cities have even more options withing the system.
Kyla
Mom to Arianna (5), Conner (3) and Trent (my baby)
To the bolded: IMO this is what causes many schools to get a 'bad' rep. All it takes is one year of a bad principal and the parents who care about their childs education and can afford to pull their children. The kids left in the school are ones whos parents dont care about their education (this attitude is translated clearly to most kids), or cant afford to drive their kids to school (or homeschool). These are the kids that act out the most and need extra help. In an average school these kids are mixed into the school population and often can overcome their disadvantage, however, when this is most of the school, you end up with a situation where experienced teachers dont want to teach at the school, more class time is spent on classroom management then learning, and students who do want to learn just keep their heads down and do the best they can.
We had this situation in our district until recently. They ended up closing a school because it had so few kids in it. I would not teach in the school because it was so horrible to be in. The school near our house was similar, but not quite as bad. They amalgamated the two schools and now force you to go to your neighborhood school. Our property values have gone WAY up as the school is slowly getting a better reputation, and IMO all the kids are getting a better education.
Kyla
Mom to Arianna (5), Conner (3) and Trent (my baby)
We do not have the option here of going to a different school then what we are zoned for unless we get approval from both schools. The biggest district here in town made it very clear they would not release the money for students that wanted to go out of dist, and they would not accept any new students this year
Lisa
Molly, Morgan, Mia and Carson
We had this debate awhile back. There were many that felt strongly that any school that received public funds would need to teach on evolution and not have any prayer or was religious in any way.
This may be so, but I am still not willing to send my kids to one of the worst schools in the area under the hopes that it will be a better school 10 years from now. There is a lot of gang violence. I also have heard from a neighbour about his daughter's experiences of being the only white child in an all black class. Now I have no problem with anyone's color of skin, but how she was treated by the other students was terrible. This is just not a school district that I am willing to put my kids in.
~Bonita~
Sorry, just realized my post came off as judgy to you. I totally get where you are coming from. I actually put DD into our french school, and have to drive her every day, and a big part of that is not wanting her in our neighborhood school. The younger grades are good now, but the older grades......I wont teach them, so I wouldnt want her exposed to them, and they mix the grades 3 times a week. So as much as I hate it, it is more the system that I have a problem with, not the individual parents who do what is best for their kids.
Kyla
Mom to Arianna (5), Conner (3) and Trent (my baby)
I think that "vouchers" are just a way to get tax payers to fund religious schools, in essence making them public schools, only publics schools that are now allowed to violate the First Amendment. I'm against it. I agree that if you want to send your kid to a religious school, it should be on you to pay it. I also think that any school that accepts public money should be subject to the same rules as normal public schools.
Bookmarks