An alliance of corporations and conservative activists is mobilising to penalise homeowners who install their own solar panels ? casting them as ?freeriders? ? in a sweeping new offensive against renewable energy, the Guardian has learned.
Over the coming year, the American Legislative Exchange Council (Alec) will promote legislation with goals ranging from penalising individual homeowners and weakening state clean energy regulations, to blocking the Environmental Protection Agency, which is Barack Obama?s main channel for climate action.
Details of Alec?s strategy to block clean energy development at every stage ? from the individual rooftop to the White House ? are revealed as the group gathers for its policy summit in Washington this week.
About 800 state legislators and business leaders are due to attend the three-day event, which begins on Wednesday with appearances by the Wisconsin senator Ron Johnson and the Republican budget guru and fellow Wisconsinite Paul Ryan.
Other Alec speakers will be a leading figure behind the recent government shutdown, US senator Ted Cruz of Texas, and the governors of Indiana and Wyoming, Mike Pence and Matt Mead.
For 2014, Alec plans to promote a suite of model bills and resolutions aimed at blocking Barack Obama from cutting greenhouse gas emissions, and state governments from promoting the expansion of wind and solar power through regulations known as Renewable Portfolio Standards.
Documents obtained by the Guardian show the core elements of its strategy began to take shape at the previous board meeting in Chicago in August, with meetings of its energy, environment and agriculture subcommittees.
Further details of Alec?s strategy were provided by John Eick, the legislative analyst for Alec?s energy, environment and agriculture program.
Eick told the Guardian the group would be looking closely in the coming year at how individual homeowners with solar panels are compensated for feeding surplus electricity back into the grid.
?This is an issue we are going to be exploring,? Eick said. He said Alec wanted to lower the rate electricity companies pay homeowners for direct power generation ? and maybe even charge homeowners for feeding power into the grid.
?As it stands now, those direct generation customers are essentially freeriders on the system. They are not paying for the infrastructure they are using. In effect, all the other non direct generation customers are being penalised,? he said.
Eick dismissed the suggestion that individuals who buy and install home-based solar panels had made such investments. ?How are they going to get that electricity from their solar panel to somebody else?s house?? he said. ?They should be paying to distribute the surplus electricity.?
In November, Arizona became the first state to charge customers for installing solar panels. The fee, which works out to about $5 a month for the average homeowner, was far lower than that sought by the main electricity company, which was seeking to add up to $100 a month to customers? bills. Gabe Elsner, director of the Energy and Policy Institute, said the attack on small-scale solar was part of the larger Alec project to block clean energy.
?They are trying to eliminate pro-solar policies in the states to protect utility industry profits,? he said.
The group sponsored at least 77 energy bills in 34 states last year. The measures were aimed at opposing renewable energy standards, pushing through the Keystone XL pipeline project, and barring oversight on fracking, according to an analysis by the Centre for Media and Democracy.
(SNIP - More at the link)
So to sum up, homeowners with solar power that are producing more energy than than they use are currently feeding their excess electricity back into the system, which, you would think would be a good thing for everyone. But this group wants them to have PAY to provide free energy back into the system....