Teachers, bus drivers being fingerprinted for background check?
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 58
Like Tree12Likes

Thread: Teachers, bus drivers being fingerprinted for background check?

  1. #1
    Community Host Sapphire Sunsets's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Northeast, USA
    Posts
    7,963

    Default Teachers, bus drivers being fingerprinted for background check?

    Bill would require fingerprinting teachers, bus drivers | Metro News - WCVB Home


    BOSTON ?Teachers, workers at child care centers, school bus drivers and others could soon be required to submit fingerprints for criminal background checks.

    Asked on Tuesday if he would sign the legislation, Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick said "I think so."

    The fingerprint background checks would also apply to everyone seeking to adopt children or become foster parents as well as employees of school departments who may have direct, unmonitored contact with children.

    Under the bill, the fingerprints will be submitted to the state police for a state criminal history check and forwarded to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for a national criminal history check.

    Lawmaker approval of the measure came just weeks after authorities announced an indictment against a convicted sex offender they say videotaped himself sexually assaulting children from his wife's unlicensed day care business.

    Yay? or Nay?



    ********

    Absolutely. CORI's only cover a conviction in the state where it's checked.

  2. #2
    Mega Poster mom3girls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,439

    Default

    We already have to do this, I thought it was common practice? Totally fine
    Lisa
    Molly, Morgan, Mia and Carson

  3. #3
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    7,261

    Default

    We already do this too. I thought it was nationwide. Even parent volunteers on field trips have to be fingerprinted and have a current TB reading.
    boilermaker and mom3girls like this.

  4. #4
    Prolific Poster
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,219

    Default

    I'm so okay with this. After that daycare guy (that news article still sickens me whenever I think about it) it's clearly needed. We only do Cori checks here right now in Mass. but it includes parent volunteers.

  5. #5
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    6,930

    Default

    Educators and bus drivers (secretaries, custodians, cafeteria workers, etc.) in my district are all fingerprinted and have background checks. Even parent volunteers have to be fingerprinted, and pay for it as well. I have no problem with it.
    boilermaker likes this.

  6. #6
    Community Host
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    13,532

    Default

    I also was under the impression that this was already required. It is here. I also do not have a problem with this.

    ~Bonita~

  7. #7
    Mega Poster mom3girls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,439

    Default

    Recently it was learned that one of the team coaches at my DD's gym was taking pictures of the girls naked, he was busted for child porn. I kind of wish all coaches had to be fingerprinted
    Lisa
    Molly, Morgan, Mia and Carson

  8. #8
    Prolific Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,334

    Default

    How in the world does fingerprinting stop people from doing any of this? I am confused.

    I am not against fingerprinting, it helps identify the missing and dead, I wouldn't be against everyone being fingerprinted (because that would catch the most vulnerable, who are more likely to go missing), but I do not understand how fingerprinting has any relation to preventing a coach taking pictures of children naked.

  9. #9
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    14,461

    Default

    I think that it should be an obvious for teachers or daycare workers or anyone in a position of authority who has the potential to have alone time with a student ~ I'm actually surprised that that isn't a mandate there already, it is here.

    I have to be honest and say that I would be annoyed if I had to be fingerprinted and background checked and pay for it to volunteer in my childrens school ~ and say that it having parents have to do so would not give me an increased sense of safety. In fact, it would make me upset because I would think that it would decrease parent/grandparent participation in the school. For instance, for my sons birthday I have my Dad set up to be a "mystery reader" in my sons classroom as a surprise for my son. He would have to be fingerprinted and background checked to go to the school and volunteer? No way! So annoying and invasive! there are 475 kids his elementary school and we have a 70% parental participation rate in the PTO, and that doesn't even count the number of occasional volunteers like my Dad or other grandparents/aunts/uncles who pop in for occasional visits/participation. I would think that that number would go WAY down if people had to be vetted and fingerprinted, and that would be a huge loss for the kids. I don't think that that sort of thing provides any additional safety for the kids, when these volunteers are never alone with the kids and are not really a threat to be in a "predatory" role.
    Alissa_Sal and fuchsiasky like this.

  10. #10
    Prolific Poster ftmom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,378

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blather View Post
    How in the world does fingerprinting stop people from doing any of this? I am confused.

    I am not against fingerprinting, it helps identify the missing and dead, I wouldn't be against everyone being fingerprinted (because that would catch the most vulnerable, who are more likely to go missing), but I do not understand how fingerprinting has any relation to preventing a coach taking pictures of children naked.
    I dont get this either. I dont have a problem with a background check and it is required here, and I wouldnt have a problem with fingerprinting if someone could explain to me how it protects the kids.
    Kyla
    Mom to Arianna (5), Conner (3) and Trent (my baby)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
v -->

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Terms & Conditions