Teen Mom's Yearbook Photo Banned
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
Like Tree4Likes
  • 1 Post By Rivergallery
  • 2 Post By Jessica80
  • 1 Post By Potter75

Thread: Teen Mom's Yearbook Photo Banned

  1. #1
    Prolific Poster
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,219

    Default Teen Mom's Yearbook Photo Banned

    Teen mom's photo banned from yearbook - KLTV.com-Tyler, Longview, Jacksonville, Texas | ETX News.

    School had seniors take a picture with a prop that best represents them, like a musical instrument or sports equipment. This girl took her picture with her baby. The school pulled it saying it promoted teen pregnancy.

    Is the school right that this was inappropriate for the yearbook or should they have printed it since there was no specifications on what the "props" could be?
    Mom to Elizabeth (6) and Corinne (4)

  2. #2
    Mega Poster mom3girls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,440

    Default

    If they said no other people then they have every right to pull it. We had some pretty specific guidelines for our senior pictures.
    Lisa
    Molly, Morgan, Mia and Carson

  3. #3
    Posting Addict Rivergallery's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    9,761

    Default

    Silly.. petty stuff. I do not see it as promoting teen pregnancy, but of a wonderful choice she finally made.. I would much rather see moms loving on their children (at any age), than the ravages of the choice abortion makes in a friends heart.

    I did not see a guideline in there for "no other people" rather, nothing to do with the person's family.. Maybe she should have brought in a car seat? or a baby bottle? How do those things define a person less than a musical instrument...? I would contest her child defines her MORE. I did read it as an object though, it didn't specifically say no other people in the photo. And I would have thought she might pick something like her child's baby blanket..
    They do have a right to put whatever photos in they want.. it just seems petty.
    freddieflounder101 likes this.
    DH-Aug 30th 1997 Josiah - 6/3/02 Isaac 7/31/03

  4. #4
    Prolific Poster
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,219

    Default

    I agree with RG (what?!?) that I didn't see anything saying that they couldn't have other people in it "pre ban" but only said that now when they banned it. That might come up but I honestly don't think they said no people. This girl seems to have a decent head on her shoulders and I think if it said no people she wouldn't have.

    I don't think this promotes teen pregnancy and to be honest, I find her story encouraging to all students. She worked her butt off to graduate early and to start college early all while working just under full time. That's awesome and not something a lot of teens, WITHOUT kids, would think of doing.
    Mom to Elizabeth (6) and Corinne (4)

  5. #5
    Prolific Poster
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    2,219

    Default

    Yahoo! Shine - Women's Lifestyle | Healthy Living and Fashion Blogs

    This article states the only directions were "bring something that represents you and helped you achieve something"
    Mom to Elizabeth (6) and Corinne (4)

  6. #6
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    14,461

    Default

    I'm with Rivergallery too!
    Jessica80 likes this.

  7. #7
    Posting Addict Spacers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    My avatar is the tai chi -- a symbol of the eternal cycle of life
    Posts
    16,484

    Default

    I'm with the school on this one. The senior portrait section is for portraits of the students. A baby isn't a prop, it's a family member and photos with family members belong in a different section. They gave her the opportunity to retake her photo and she chose not to. But they shouldn't have allowed pets by the same reasoning.
    David Letterman is retiring. Such great memories of watching him over the past thirty-two years!

  8. #8
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    23,461

    Default

    I think she was actually making a wonderful statement by including her baby. And I agree with the others that she is setting a positive example, not a negative one.
    Laurie, mom to:
    Nathaniel ( 10 ) and Juliet ( 7 )




    Baking Adventures In A Messy Kitchen (blog)

  9. #9
    Posting Addict fuchsiasky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    British Columbia
    Posts
    5,925

    Default

    At our highschool it was standard for the young moms to have their babies in their school pics with them. I thought it was great. There was a really good program for them that included onsite daycare. So the babies were actually part of the school too. Those moms worked really hard to pull it off and having their babes in their pics acknowledged that.
    Me- Fuchsia
    My Wonderful Partner - Rob
    DD - December 17 2008
    DSD 15
    DSS 18
    Feline Furbabies - Sophie and Indigo

    Little Babe 22/12/05


+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
v -->

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Terms & Conditions