Victim's families telling charity where money should go?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Victim's families telling charity where money should go?

  1. #1
    Community Host wlillie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    6,469

    Default Victim's families telling charity where money should go?

    Colorado shooting victims' families criticize relief charity - CNN.com



    "We're certain that everyone who donated their hard-earned wages intended for 100% of the donations to go directly to the victims and then each family affected would use those funds for what they most needed to help their healing process," Teves told reporters. "Unfortunately that doesn't seem to be the case."

    Do you think they have a point?

    webpage for the charity
    https://givingfirst.org/index.php?se...namic&cmsID=36

    The Fund does not make grants directly to individuals, but to nonprofit organizations offering assistance to those individuals. Community First Foundation has waived all fees for the administration of the Fund.
    Last edited by wlillie; 08-28-2012 at 05:29 PM.

  2. #2
    Posting Addict GloriaInTX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    7,595

    Default

    That's what happens when you let the government get their fingers into anything. $5,000 to 70 families is $350,000. What happens to the other $4.5M .... administrative expenses? Some of them probably have just medical bills that are more than $5k.

    If the money was donated specifically for these victims, that is where the money needs to go.
    Mom to Lee, Jake, Brandon, Rocco
    Stepmom to Ryan, Regan, Braden, Baley
    Granddaughters Kylie 10/18/2010 & Aleya 4/22/2013


    I never consider a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosopy, as a cause for withdrawing from a friend. --Thomas Jefferson

  3. #3
    Community Host Alissa_Sal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Debating Away on the Debate Board!
    Posts
    11,771

    Default

    I think they definitely have a point; if they are going to call it the Aurora Victims Relief Fund, people do expect it to go directly to help those people directly impacted by the tragedy, not dispersed to a 3rd party that gives the money out at their discretion. I wouldn't say that I expected 100% to go to the families, because I know that charities typically do have some administrative costs, but I would definitely expect the vast majority of the money to go to the victims.

    Gloria, if I wanted to make this political I would argue this shows that if we went with the conservative dream of people relying on charity for their sole source of relief, this is what could happen...:P
    -Alissa, mom to Tristan (5) and Reid (the baby!)

    Got an opinion? We've got a board! Come join us for some lively debate on the Face Off! Debate Arena board.

  4. #4
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    7,259

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GloriaInTX View Post
    That's what happens when you let the government get their fingers into anything. $5,000 to 70 families is $350,000. What happens to the other $4.5M .... administrative expenses? Some of them probably have just medical bills that are more than $5k.

    If the money was donated specifically for these victims, that is where the money needs to go.
    I thought the medical bills were already waived? Was that just a few of the hospitals that treated them?

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
v -->

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Terms & Conditions