+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Removed thread

  1. #1
    Online Community Director MissyJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Rocky Mountain Wanna-be
    Posts
    12,538

    Default Removed thread

    Hi all,

    I wanted to drop by and take a moment to explain that we have removed a thread promoting a Facebook group. While I do understand that this can be another fun way for people to connect, the thread is considered a violation of our Community Guidelines as quoted below. In addition to being a drain on participation on your board here, we also consider the safety / privacy aspect involved for our members. While 98+% of those you meet online, (on public or private sites), are who they represent themselves to be, unfortunately at times we have learned that tiny minority can create havoc... something that we try to minimize as much as possible onsite -- particularly as we know the very real and wonderful families involved. We encourage all of our members to practice General Internet Safety and remain protective of anyone's personal contact information... including your own.

    Please know that we do respect and appreciate that Facebook is a very popular medium and that it does have value and use. Ultimately though, we do ask that members continue to abide by the Community Guidelines we have in place:

    We request that our members refrain from posting on the boards specific events that are alternatives to the normal routine at Pregnancy.org. Some inappropriate examples would include telling members to go elsewhere to meet off-site or purposefully using our site to promote another community/group without permission such as a public or private Facebook group.

    Because our community is so open, this behavior affects the site as a whole and can be extremely disruptive. We ask that you respect your community and the other members using it. If we find that a member is purposely attempting to move our members off-site, (whether publicly or privately), it will be dealt with accordingly, including disablement of the account.
    Thanks in advance for your understanding and cooperation! I'll look forward to sharing your journey throughout your pregnancy and beyond! Please feel free to contact me at any time!

    ~Missy (missyj@pregnancy.org)

  2. #2
    Prolific Poster StarShine65712's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,919

    Default

    Well that sucks but I understand.
    -Star

  3. #3
    Mega Poster La123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    2,961

    Default

    Personally I think it is quite harsh to ban a member for starting a facebook group. She obviously didn't know she was breaking any rules. Don't you think an explanation, and a warning would suffice? Are you also going to ban all the members who joined the group? What about all the other pregnancy.org members who now keep in touch on facebook? Should they be banned too? Or would that eliminate every long term member you have? I think an apology is in order here.

  4. #4
    Posting Addict **Tiffany**'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    15,804

    Default

    Cait got banned!?! Forever? That's very harsh! I honestly thought it wasn't a big deal to have a fb page since pg.org is on fb as well, I was aware of the policy but I guess I didn't read that fb was a deal breaker. Cait had no idea either. She was an active and valued member of this BB! I am assuming there is no going back now and reinstating her membership but I really hope I am wrong and that she can come back. I really think a warning would have been more appropriate.
    Tiffany
    Mom to: Emma 13, Isabella 10, Cole 8, Alec 6, Luke 4, Ariana 1.5, 2 angels, and precious Noah who went to Heaven at 13w6d born via induction 4/19/12. Confirmed missed m/c 1/3/13, no development past 5wks.





  5. #5
    Mega Poster
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4,584

    Default

    I *think* they do a temporary ban but am not 100%. I know member on my other BB on pg.org who got banned for something a couple years ago and it was temporary. I hope that's the case anyway!





    Blythe Marie
    10/10/12
    6 lbs 8 oz ~ 19 1/2 "

  6. #6
    Mega Poster ambie719's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    New Brunswick, Canada
    Posts
    3,422

    Default

    I also hope Cait's ban is only temporary. I would be very upset and not terribly likely to keep checking in if one of our most active members is banned permanently for an honestly innocent mistake.
    Amber/25 & Chris/36 - 15-Dec-06 Apr/08 & Oct/11


  7. #7
    Super Poster Gabsma03's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    781

    Default

    I understand the rules, but banning is a little harsh. I agree a warning would have been better. I have no idea of the fb rule.......I hope all gets resolved so she can come back ! She is an important member here !!!
    Sarah
    mom to 4
    Lilypie First Birthday tickers

  8. #8
    Online Community Director MissyJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Rocky Mountain Wanna-be
    Posts
    12,538

    Default

    Hi all!

    Sorry for not responding until now. Typically, we do not publicly discuss any action that has been taken with members unless it is a "need to know" type of situation such as a troll that has preyed on members. Our intention for temporary bans is set to serve a specific purpose... not serve as a form of embarrassment or to draw any negative attention to the member. For this situation, since Cait chose to share, I can say that the ban was specifically listed as a *temporary* ban, simply to point out to the member the Community Guidelines involved, and, in turn, get their agreement to abide by those going forward. Why the temporary ban vs. the warning? Unfortunately, with a warning some members in the past removed that option with poor reactions... creating even larger issues to disrupt the community. While I did not believe that would be the case in this instance, we do have to deal with those in the same manner. Again -- this was merely to serve as a reminder for our Community Guidelines and then, (hopefully), to allow everyone to move forward with enjoying the site!

    Cait has been awesome and -- I wholeheartedly agree that she is an asset not only to this board but our entire community! As I shared with her in our various communications, I am looking forward to continuing to share in her (and all of your!) pregnancy journey and welcome a new addition to her family!

    If you have further questions or concerns, please do feel free to drop me a note either via pm or email at missyj@pregnancy.org.

    Take care!
    ~Missy

  9. #9
    Posting Addict **Tiffany**'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    15,804

    Default

    So glad to hear Cait will be allowed back!
    Tiffany
    Mom to: Emma 13, Isabella 10, Cole 8, Alec 6, Luke 4, Ariana 1.5, 2 angels, and precious Noah who went to Heaven at 13w6d born via induction 4/19/12. Confirmed missed m/c 1/3/13, no development past 5wks.





  10. #10
    Mega Poster lemonlemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    Posts
    3,089

    Default

    Im back!!!! You guys are all so sweet Makes me feel so welcome here!!
    Cait+Kevin
    DS Brody 9/12/08
     BabyFetus Ticker

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Terms & Conditions