Hmm..
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Hmm..

  1. #1
    Community Host Ladybugsteph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    11,018

    Default Hmm..

    Okay, I'm going back through all my photos since I got my DSLR to post an "anniversary" thread, and I'm noticing that my new pictures aren't as crisp as my old ones are. I'm kinda bummed about that. I'm wondering if it's that I've switched over to Manual since then, and it's me, or if it's something with my camera.

    Exposure 0.005 sec (1/200)
    Aperture f/5.6
    Focal Length 55 mm
    ISO Speed 400



    Exposure 0.008 sec (1/125)
    Aperture f/5.6
    Focal Length 55 mm
    ISO Speed 400



    It's probably me, and not the camera. When I first got it, with that first picture, I was taking them on priority settings or even auto. I switched over to manual this past spring. I hadn't changed Memory Cards for a while (maybe a year or a little more??), and just had been deleting the stuff I didn't want and reusing it, though. Could that be the difference? I recently just bought a new one, but it's been so cold that I haven't been able to take any pictures outdoors of the kids to compare it to yet.

    ETA: Here's a shot that I took yesterday with the new card. This one was indoors though. Not sure if it makes a difference or not.

    Exposure 0.005 sec (1/200)
    Aperture f/4.5
    Focal Length 79 mm
    ISO Speed 800



    Here are some more:

    September 08
    Exposure 0.01 sec (1/100)
    Aperture f/7.1
    Focal Length 27 mm
    ISO Speed 400



    October 08
    Exposure 0.013 sec (1/80)
    Aperture f/4
    Focal Length 25 mm
    ISO Speed 100



    August 09
    Exposure 0.008 sec (1/125)
    Aperture f/8.0
    Focal Length 55 mm
    ISO Speed 400




    Definately not the best exposure wise I'm sure, but pretty typical. By this one, I was shooting manual
    August 10
    Exposure 0.008 sec (1/125)
    Aperture f/5.0
    Focal Length 40 mm
    ISO Speed 200



    September 10
    Exposure 0.003 sec (1/400)
    Aperture f/4.5
    Focal Length 31 mm
    ISO Speed 400



    November 10
    Exposure 0.004 sec (1/250)
    Aperture f/5.6
    Focal Length 55 mm
    ISO Speed 200


    Last edited by Ladybugsteph; 01-25-2011 at 05:37 PM.
    Stephanie - Mama to Carson, Jackson, and Hudson

    Facebook
    My Photography Blog
    My Year in Photos


  2. #2
    Posting Addict AmberBella's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    6,748

    Default

    It's really hard to compare one picture to one picture. How about the average?
    Wife to Rich~ 8/16/03 Mom to Nathan~ 9/30/07
     Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
     Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker

    Photography Blog

  3. #3
    Community Host Ladybugsteph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    11,018

    Default

    I added some more to the origional post.
    Stephanie - Mama to Carson, Jackson, and Hudson

    Facebook
    My Photography Blog
    My Year in Photos


  4. #4
    Posting Addict Muddee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    9,679

    Default

    I think its probably just you learning to use manual, I am sure you will get nice crisp shots with a bit more practice.

    Your pictures are all great.


    * Amanda *

  5. #5
    Posting Addict AmberBella's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    6,748

    Default

    I don't think I'm seeing what you're seeing. With the exception of the original 2nd image you posted, I don't really see a problem with sharpness.
    Wife to Rich~ 8/16/03 Mom to Nathan~ 9/30/07
     Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
     Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker

    Photography Blog

  6. #6
    Posting Addict sweetalienchick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    14,255

    Default

    are any of these processed? or are all sooc? I can sort of see what you're talking about but maybe some are sharpened for web or?
    Mikael 2, Jeanette 4,







  7. #7
    Community Host Ladybugsteph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    11,018

    Default

    I don't really sharpen much when I process them. I guess I feel like the majority of them that I take these days look the the second image that I posted. The ones I have on Flickr are the "best" that I have taken. Good to know that I'm being a little overly critical though.

    How often (if at all) do you have your camera cleaned? Is it standard to do that? I will say that when I look through my camera to take a picture, I see what looks like a little dust or something. I never see it on the picture itself. I was trying to figure out how to get it off of there, because it kinda bugs me, but I wasn't sure how. I wasn't about to go messing inside my camera not knowing what I'm doing!
    Stephanie - Mama to Carson, Jackson, and Hudson

    Facebook
    My Photography Blog
    My Year in Photos


  8. #8
    Posting Addict reeveslady's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    in a place called Exhaustion
    Posts
    12,089

    Default

    Maybe on full auto your camera does a little more sharpening? Check your settings and see if your camera is doing any sharpening on its own. Of course, that's only if you shoot jpegs.

    There are ways to test your sensors if you think they may be the problem. Here is a link to a how-to if you're interested.

    It sounds like you might have a little dust on your focus screen. It will not affect your pictures, but I understand how annoying it is to see it through the viewfinder all the time. If it's really annoying to you, I'd probably have it professionally cleaned. I've read too many articles that say you should only clean your camera's insides yourself if you absolutely 100% know what you're doing. Hope that helps!
    Suzanne
    plus DH Reeve, DS Sean, DS Luke, and DD Eve
    and furbaby Reese's Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup "Buttercup"



    My 365 Photography Project

  9. #9
    Posting Addict fudd8963's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    7,564

    Default

    I was recently looking thru pics from when I first got my SDL also. They were MUCH sharper then as well. I think a big part of mine is due to the fast that when I got the camera, the girls were only 8 months old and they are now 21 months old. They move MUCH faster now and it is so hard to get the ss fast enough while still getting enough light in. UGH, makes me really wish I had spent the extra to get a better lens and not just gone with the kit lens. But at the time it just wasn't doable.
    ~ Tara

    April 19, 09: 37 week Take Home Twins!!!!
    Addison Bree - 5lb 6oz
    Brooke Isabella - 5lb 12oz



    4,043oz of BM donated!


  10. #10
    Posting Addict sadieruth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    16,616

    Default

    I don't have any advice, but I am curious to know how often ppl have their cameras cleaned....
    Sadie- mommy to Ruthie & Randy
    My blog

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
v -->

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Terms & Conditions