JMK pics with several questions
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: JMK pics with several questions

  1. #1
    Posting Addict marymoonu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    OH-IO
    Posts
    13,652

    Default JMK pics with several questions

    Here's my answer to my own question about how to shoot toddlers, LOL... Asleep.

    Anyway, I just took these yesterday and since I mentioned that white balance is difficult for me, I wanted to see which WB you guys think is more correct, or neither? Also, it was pretty dark, so I used ISO 1600 as opposed to shooting wide open... Do you think 1600 is too high? I always tried not to go that high, but I'm not sure...?

    All shot with my 50mm lens.

    ISO 1600, f/3.5, 1/125 sec - WB set to "White fluorescent" setting


    ISO 1600, f/3.5, 1/100 sec - WB set to Auto


    So are either of these WB's close? I feel like the auto might be too yellow, but the WF might be too blue?

    Also, I'm curious what lens(es) you guys like for when you're close to your subject. Many of these, I felt like I had to chop limbs I didn't want to chop because they were laying on my couch and so I couldn't get too far above them or away from them.

    Sean Thomas - 6/30/09 @ 7:17pm 8lb 8oz, 19", 40w5d
    Calvin Michael - 2/28/11 @ 7:39pm 6lb 8oz, 18", 37w5d
    Nolan Matthew - 5/1/13 @ 11:54pm 6lb 4oz, 19", 38w4d

    May 26, 2010 - 7w1d

  2. #2
    Community Host
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    College Station, TX
    Posts
    4,858

    Default

    I think the fluorescent is probably a closer match than the auto wb. It does look too blue to me, but just a touch. And as I am at work, I'm not calibrated or anything.

    I think you got a really nice shot here. And for iso 1600, there is not a lot of grain. You could probably run noiseware if you are worried about any grain.

    As for what lens, I vary depending on my subject - regardless of how close I am. I know a lot of folks really love using a good 35mm prime for small spaces inside though.

    TFS!
    GiGi

  3. #3
    Posting Addict mlark1128's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    6,622

    Default

    I was thinking the auto looked better--the first looks blue with a LOT of magenta to it. I think the second just looks off b/c it's underexposed. I think if you brightened it and added a touch more contrast it would look a lot better.
    Meagan & Aaron
    DS Luke, 5
    DS Matthias (Jake) - 31 Weeks, 3lbs 10ozs!




  4. #4
    Posting Addict cazzoom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    9,116

    Default

    1 is too magenta. the other is too yellow.

    I always have my WB set to cloudy. Seems to work best for me.

    however love the sleepy moment you captured
    TTC 14.5 years
    10 BFP's, 10 Angel babies
    Wanted always forgotten never

    Add me on facebook

  5. #5
    Mega Poster TracyF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts
    3,730

    Default

    I thought the auto WB was a bit better too. I often scroll through my WB options and just compare with what I see with the naked eye, as to what's closer. Having said that, I'm not great at WB, so I'm no expert!!

    Doesn't look like too much noise at ISO 1600, so if you can shoot at that ISO in the dimmer light without getting noise, I'd say go for it. As GiGi says, you can always run it through noiseware. My P&S gets a terrible amount of noise even at ISO 400, so I use noiseware often and it's great.

    Married Anthony April 2, 2005
    Nora born Feb. 14th, 2007
    Micah born Jan. 20, 2009

  6. #6
    Super Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    925

    Default

    What a sweet capture!

    I like the auto white as well, and agree that the exposure is a little off and it would look great brightened up a little. As for lens, my tameron 28-75 never leaves my camera....

    Interesting to hear that cloudy works for you cazz!
    ~Jess~
    Ava 5.15.06
    Kaitlyn 9.10.10
    Cora 6.18.12

    Sisters

    Lilypie First Birthday tickers

  7. #7
    Mega Poster JDBabyHopes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    4,515

    Default

    Great pic, Mary!!

    I agree with a PP about always setting my WB to cloudy (unless I'm in bright, crazy outdoor sunlight)!! It gives you "warmer" images, which is really easy to scale back if it's TOO warm. That being said, I'm heavy handed with the warm colors, so maybe I shouldn't do that. Although I think warmer colors on kids looks better than the fake plastic white colors. But that is totally my personal preference.

    I think the auto looks much better!
    Jen
    Owen: 2/21/10 (36w)
    Samuel: 6/26/12 (40w5d) -My VBAC baby!-
    Lilypie Fourth Birthday tickers
    Lilypie First Birthday tickers

  8. #8
    Community Host Ladybugsteph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    11,018

    Default

    So sweet! I like the auto WB as well. I, too, tend to lean towards the warmer images. Sometimes I tend to overdo it
    Stephanie - Mama to Carson, Jackson, and Hudson

    Facebook
    My Photography Blog
    My Year in Photos


  9. #9
    Mega Poster TracyF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts
    3,730

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JDBabyHopes View Post
    I agree with a PP about always setting my WB to cloudy (unless I'm in bright, crazy outdoor sunlight)!! It gives you "warmer" images, which is really easy to scale back if it's TOO warm.
    Interestingly, although I think he was referring more to landscape shots, the author of Understanding Exposure said that he uses "cloudy" as his WB setting most of the time, because of the warmth it gives. Today I took most of my flower shots with a cloudy WB though it was brilliantly sunny, and actually loved the results. Warmth is great! Of course, with people, it can be overdone, but I prefer overly warm to overly cool, for sure.

    Married Anthony April 2, 2005
    Nora born Feb. 14th, 2007
    Micah born Jan. 20, 2009

  10. #10
    Mega Poster JDBabyHopes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    4,515

    Default

    Yep, Tracy, I thought I remembered reading the cloudy WB in UE!! I did a ton of research on photographing newborns before I took pics for my friend last month, and on several newborn photographer "how to" blogs, they all recommended the cloudy WB setting for that warm, pinky newborn skin. So that's where my WB usually stays, now!! But that's because my pasty white child will turn out cool in the harshest, brightest of sunlight, too.
    Jen
    Owen: 2/21/10 (36w)
    Samuel: 6/26/12 (40w5d) -My VBAC baby!-
    Lilypie Fourth Birthday tickers
    Lilypie First Birthday tickers

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
v -->

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Terms & Conditions