One from a maternity session yesterday.. Does it work?
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: One from a maternity session yesterday.. Does it work?

  1. #1
    Posting Addict cazzoom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Victoria, Australia

    Default One from a maternity session yesterday.. Does it work?

    I had a maternity session yesterday, these guys are awesome people. really friendly

    Anyway I passed on this initially as it was initially a portrait shot where Mum was watching their 2 year old behind me.

    Then I decided to play and crop it to this way, I then extended the canvas to make the composition a little more interesting.

    I would love to know what you think? I know, the hand chop is there unfortunatly can't change it.

    TTC 14.5 years
    10 BFP's, 10 Angel babies
    Wanted always forgotten never

    Add me on facebook

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2011


    I was sorta 'iffy' on it but when i took your pic and transformed it to b/w just to see if i liked that better...i think i really prefer it in b/w. Hope you don't mind Some pics just work better in b/w and i think this is one of them.
    momma (25) and 2 gorgeous kids

  3. #3
    Posting Addict AmberBella's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    So Cal


    Doesn't work at all for me. The hand chop especially just makes me think...why in the world do we have all that black space and not all of the subject.
    Wife to Rich~ 8/16/03 Mom to Nathan~ 9/30/07
     Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
     Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker

    Photography Blog

  4. #4
    Community Host Ladybugsteph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006


    I'm kind of with Amber on this one. I think there's a bit too much space on the right side. Also, if you do use this one, you might want to clean up by dad's chest a bit. Looks a little bluish instead of black.
    Stephanie - Mama to Carson, Jackson, and Hudson

    My Photography Blog
    My Year in Photos

  5. #5
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2006


    I do wish the hand were showing, but it's not a deal breaker for me. What is a little off (probably just something only I would think) is that I wish I could see more of the top of the dad's jeans/pants. It just appears as though he is naked
    Me 33
    DH 32
    Angel babies 9/06 & 3/07
    DS born June 11, 2008
    DD born February 11, 2011
    Miss Blue Eyes

+ Reply to Thread


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
v -->

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Terms & Conditions