Wedding CC Please
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Wedding CC Please

  1. #1
    Posting Addict Coconut2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Lake City, FL
    Posts
    6,439

    Default Wedding CC Please

    I photographed a very good friends wedding this weekend in Orlando. I did it for free since of course I'm not a professional. I worked 6 hours from start to finish and man was I sore. I shot the wedding, reception, group, and bride/groom pictures. It started raining at the end of the ceremony so that wasn't too fun. Then we were supposed to take all these fun outdoor pictures but it was pouring so we had to take a bunch of indoor pictures but the civic center wasn't very pretty so that was a challenge. After everything was over and everyone left it had finally stopped raining so we got to go outside and take some pictures. I got a lot of pictures I'm very happy with and hope they are too when I get them to them. Here are a few of my favorites. What do you ladies think? I'm still learning so I'm taking all of the advice I can get.
    These are all SOOC only watermarked, no flash, in manual mode.
    This one was taken inside during the rain but I had them stand in front of the sliding glass doors and when they opened I started snapping away. Settings: f4.5, 1/125sec, ISO400
    549
    These two were in front of a lake with a fountain the sun was setting and very beautiful. I love how they look like they are glowing. Settings: f5.6, 1/125sec, ISO400
    1617
    I love the sun flare right where their lips are kissing, almost like magic. Settings: f8, 1/125sec, ISO100
    1605
    Stephanie & Shane Proud Parent's To
    Victoria (7-28-05), Vincent (6-5-07), Vance (6-5-09), Viking (5-13-10), & Valiant Batman (6-5-11)
    3 monkeys

  2. #2
    Posting Addict AmberBella's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    6,748

    Default

    #1. I'm not a fan of how the flash was used in the first shot. Funny...you said you didn't use flash...did you know it was on? You also weren't in manual for that first shot....you were in shutter priority and your exif data is also listing auto ISO. You would have had a much nicer shot if you could have either bounced that flash or exposed for the couple without flash.

    #2. A nice moment, but the focus is seriously off. Too bad.

    #3. Nice, but I don't like the building in the background. I'd prefer to see the couple much brighter. It would be okay if the background were light enough to make this a silhouette, but as is....the whole photo is just too dark.
    Wife to Rich~ 8/16/03 Mom to Nathan~ 9/30/07
     Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
     Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker

    Photography Blog

  3. #3
    Posting Addict Coconut2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Lake City, FL
    Posts
    6,439

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AmberBella View Post
    #1. I'm not a fan of how the flash was used in the first shot. Funny...you said you didn't use flash...did you know it was on?

    #2. A nice moment, but the focus is seriously off. Too bad.

    #3. Nice, but I don't like the building in the background. I'd prefer to see the couple much brighter. It would be okay if the background were light enough to make this a silhouette, but as is....the whole photo is just too dark.
    I forgot I had my speedlite on for the first one because we were inside and it was dark, the other two were taken with natural lightening.

    Is number 2 completely out of focus? My husband and I have been staring at it and I felt like something was off but couldn't figure it out, it seems like her hair is out of focus but their faces aren't. I have several other shoots just like this maybe I have a better one I will look and post if I do tomorrow.

    Do you think a tighter crop would work better for the third one?
    Stephanie & Shane Proud Parent's To
    Victoria (7-28-05), Vincent (6-5-07), Vance (6-5-09), Viking (5-13-10), & Valiant Batman (6-5-11)
    3 monkeys

  4. #4
    Posting Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    16,994

    Default

    Maybe crop the last one portrait so you can get rid of the building? I really like the sunflare!
    DD 8.03 - DS1 8.04 - DS2 6.10


    Photography Blog

    Facebook Fanpage!

  5. #5
    Posting Addict Coconut2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Lake City, FL
    Posts
    6,439

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IliLexy View Post
    Maybe crop the last one portrait so you can get rid of the building? I really like the sunflare!
    Thanks I love the sunflare too. Is this better?

    1605
    Stephanie & Shane Proud Parent's To
    Victoria (7-28-05), Vincent (6-5-07), Vance (6-5-09), Viking (5-13-10), & Valiant Batman (6-5-11)
    3 monkeys

  6. #6
    Mega Poster TracyF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts
    3,652

    Default

    Stephita, I would love to see #1 with some editing. Perhaps play with the curves, increase contrast, and clone out the yellow sign in the background?

    The sunflare is cool, for sure.

    On #2, it does look out of focus, which is too bad!

    Married Anthony April 2, 2005
    Nora born Feb. 14th, 2007
    Micah born Jan. 20, 2009

  7. #7
    Posting Addict sadieruth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    16,581

    Default

    1. Ya, this one needs some editing and it might work.
    2. I agree, it's OOF. Sorry.
    3. I like the sunflare, but I agree with Amber- it's too dark. Play with it some more and see what you can do. I like the crop where the building is out.
    Sadie- mommy to Ruthie & Randy
    My blog

  8. #8
    Posting Addict Amy_&_Eva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    6,498

    Default

    Ditto previous CC, although I would call #2 blurry rather than OOF. It looks like motion blur to me.

    Is that the veil over the groom in #1? hard to tell, kind of odd. Also there is a road sign back there behind the bride.

  9. #9
    Posting Addict AmberBella's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    6,748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amy_&_Eva View Post
    Ditto previous CC, although I would call #2 blurry rather than OOF. It looks like motion blur to me.

    Is that the veil over the groom in #1? hard to tell, kind of odd. Also there is a road sign back there behind the bride.
    I agree...though I'm not sure how you got motion blur at these settings. Regardless, it definitely does look like motion blur.
    Wife to Rich~ 8/16/03 Mom to Nathan~ 9/30/07
     Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
     Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker

    Photography Blog

  10. #10
    Posting Addict Coconut2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Lake City, FL
    Posts
    6,439

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amy_&_Eva View Post
    Is that the veil over the groom in #1?
    Yes the veil is over the bride and groom in 1.
    Stephanie & Shane Proud Parent's To
    Victoria (7-28-05), Vincent (6-5-07), Vance (6-5-09), Viking (5-13-10), & Valiant Batman (6-5-11)
    3 monkeys

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
v -->

About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Terms & Conditions