Does anyone have one? Would you recommend it?
DH thinks that the quality (paper, ink) wouldn't last as long as the prints you order through Target, etc (hi-tech Kodak machines, paper, ink). He used the old fax paper that eventually fades to compare it too. He just thinks the "professionally" printed photos would last years compared to photos printed through a printer.
What do you guys think?
Honestly, I used to print all my pics at home, and none of them have faded.
I find it's waaaaay cheaper to get them printed than to pay for the ink, good quality photo paper, and the time/hassle of printing them at home. Just my 2 cents.
We have an Epson of some sort (not at home, can't check the brand), never had an issue with it!
I have an epson stylus photo px700w printer and i love it! for me it is way cheaper to print photos here at home than to have them sent out to be printed. And not only is it cheaper but i have total control of what i want to crop out if I need to if the size isn't right. And my colors come out great. (i was having lots and lots of problems taking my photos to be printed somewhere else ..... i.e. too red, chopped in some places) the reason it is cheaper for me though is because the closest place i could get my photos printed is like 20 minutes from here and then it is like 20 cents a photo or something like that. I don't remember but it isn't cheap Heck, I can't even print a cheap 12x12 here. It was going to cost me over $100 to print 15 12x12's here And the ink seems to last a long time in my printer! I can print whenever I want and not have to get in my car to drive somewhere It is a PAIN going to the mall where that photo place is. always too many people around oh and I use regular glossy photo paper. it feels and looks pretty good. I'm sure these photos will last awhile.
I have a great Sony photo printer that just prints 4x6 or 3.5x5. It prints in layers and I believe they won't fade. The quality is fabulous BUT not worth the money. It is $25 per cartridge and that prints about 25 pictures.